Office of the General Counsel, U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT).
Notice of DOT authorities and practice.
This notice explains the U.S. Department of Transportation's (DOT) authorities and practice in the areas of proposed airline mergers and acquisitions.
Start Supplemental Information
This Notice describes the U.S. Department of Transportation's practice and authorities with regard to airline mergers and acquisitions, including those that involve a transfer of slots. The Notice is not proposing any changes, new procedures, or new approaches.
II. Legal Authority To Review Slot Transactions Resulting From Proposed Airline Mergers and Acquisitions
The DOT has authority over slot transactions that stem from proposed airline mergers and acquisitions.
The authority arises from several statutory provisions, as outlined below.
Under 49 U.S.C. 41712, DOT is authorized to prohibit airline conduct comparable to antitrust violations. Specifically, DOT may prohibit conduct that it determines is an “unfair method of competition.” 
In addition, like several other agencies with respect to their regulated entities, DOT has independent authority under the Clayton Act.
This independent authority derives from 15 U.S.C. 21, under which DOT may prohibit airline acquisitions and mergers that may reduce competition or tend to create a monopoly in the airline industry.
The DOT/Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) also has authority to administer airline slots under 49 U.S.C. 40103.
This authority permits the FAA to assign the use of airspace to ensure its efficient use and modify or revoke a slot assignment when required in the public interest. Section 40101, Title 49, directs DOT and the FAA, in carrying out aviation programs, to consider certain enumerated factors, plus additional factors that may be considered in the Secretary or FAA Administrator's discretion, as being in the public interest,
including furthering airline competition.
III. The DOT Review of Airline Merger or Acquisition Transactions
With respect to DOT's competition and public interest review authorities, DOT's practice has been to use its expertise with respect to the airline industry to provide the Department's views and otherwise assist the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) in DOJ's analysis of airline mergers or acquisitions. The DOT will continue this practice for airline mergers and acquisitions under DOJ review. DOT will consult with DOJ, inform DOJ as early as possible regarding any concerns, and defer to DOJ judgment where DOJ determines that a merger or acquisition violates the antitrust laws and should be enjoined. The DOT will not duplicate review or enforcement activities carried out by DOJ and will not create undue expense or burdens upon parties to an airline merger or acquisition.
In the event that DOT has concerns that fall outside the DOJ competition review process, DOT, in the discretion of the Secretary, may seek independent resolution of these concerns, as has been its practice. In doing so, DOT will work with the relevant parties, including DOJ, as it did in the recent merger between US Airways and American Airlines, to determine whether public interest remedies are appropriate, and if so, to pursue such remedies. In that case, DOT applied the Section 40101 public interest policy considerations to maintain and enhance service to small communities with respect to the merger between US Airways and American Airlines. The DOT entered into an agreement under which the carriers committed to use certain slots at Reagan Washington National Airport to Start Printed Page 2469preserve nonstop service from DCA to small and medium-sized communities.
In the event that DOT exercises its public interest authority, DOT will confer with DOJ to ensure that any public interest remedies it seeks to impose are harmonized with any antitrust relief sought or imposed by DOJ.
End Supplemental Information
Issued in Washington, DC, on January 9, 2015.
Kathryn B. Thomson,
[FR Doc. 2015-00599 Filed 1-15-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4910-9X-P