This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
273
as of
10/09/2026 at 10:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2015-01599 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
01/27/2015 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2015-01599 (80 FR 4544)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Commerce (“the Department”) is conducting new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen fish fillets (“fish fillets”) from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam (“Vietnam”). The period of review is August 1, 2013, through January 31, 2014. The review covers two companies that are producers and exporters of subject merchandise, Nam Phuong Seafood Co., Ltd. (“Nam Phuong”) and NTACO Corporation (“NTACO”). The Department preliminarily determines that Nam Phuong's and NTACO's sales to the United States were not
bona fide
and is preliminarily rescinding these new shipper reviews. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
DATES:
Effective Date:
January 28, 2015.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Matthew Renkey (Nam Phuong) or Steven Hampton (NTACO), AD/CVD Operations, Office V, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-2312 or (202) 482-0116, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On April 3, 2014, the Department published notice of initiation of new shipper reviews of fish fillets from Vietnam for the period August 1, 2013, through January 31, 2014.[1]
On August 20, 2014, the Department partially extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results by 60 days.[2]
On October 29, 2014, the Department fully extended the deadline for issuing the preliminary results by an additional 60 days.[3]
The revised deadline for the preliminary results of these new shipper reviews is January 20, 2015.[4]
Scope of the Order
The product covered by the order is frozen fish fillets, including regular, shank, and strip fillets and portions thereof, whether or not breaded or marinated, of the species
Pangasius Bocourti, Pangasius Hypophthalmus
(also known as
Pangasius Pangasius) and
Pangasius Micronemus.
These products are classifiable under tariff article codes 0304.29.6033, 0304.62.0020, 0305.59.0000, 0305.59.4000, 1604.19.2000, 1604.19.2100, 1604.19.3000, 1604.19.3100, 1604.19.4000, 1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5000, 1604.19.5100, 1604.19.6100 and 1604.19.8100 (Frozen Fish Fillets of the species
Pangasius
including basa and tra) of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (“HTSUS”).[5]
Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.[6]
( printed page 4545)
Methodology
The Department is conducting these reviews in accordance with section 751(a)(2)(B) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (“the Act”) and 19 CFR 351.214. For a full description of the methodology underlying our conclusions,
see
the Preliminary Decision Memorandum. The Preliminary Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (“ACCESS”).[7]
ACCESS is available to registered users at
http://access.trade.gov
and in the Central Records Unit, room 7046 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the internet at
http://www.trade.gov/enforcement/.
The signed Preliminary Decision Memorandum and the electronic versions of the Preliminary Decision Memorandum are identical in content.
Bona Fides Analysis
As discussed in the
bona fides
memos, the Department preliminarily finds that the sales by Nam Phuong and NTACO are not
bona fide,
and that these sales do not provide a reasonable or reliable basis for calculating dumping margins.[8]
With respect to Nam Phuong, the Department reached this conclusion based on the totality of circumstances, namely: (a) The atypical nature of Nam Phuong's price; (b) the atypical involvement of other entities in the sale; (c) atypical circumstances surrounding production; and (d) late payment. With respect to NTACO, the Department reached this conclusion based on the totality of circumstances, namely: (a) The atypical nature of NTACO's price; (b) the atypical involvement of another entity in the sale; (c) atypical circumstances surrounding production; and (d) late payment. Because these non-
bona fide
sales were the only sales of subject merchandise that Nam Phuong and NTACO made during the POR, the Department is preliminarily rescinding these new shipper reviews.
Disclosure and Public Comments
The Department will disclose analysis performed to parties to the proceeding within five days after the date of publication of this notice.[9]
Interested parties are invited to comment on the preliminary results of these reviews. Interested parties may submit case briefs no later than 30 days after the date of publication of the preliminary results.[10]
Rebuttal briefs, limited to issues raised in case briefs, may be filed no later than five days after the time limit for filing the case briefs.[11]
Any interested party may request a hearing within 30 days of publication of the preliminary results in the
Federal Register
.[12]
Hearing requests should contain the following information: (1) The party's name, address, and telephone number; (2) the number of participants; and (3) a list of the issues to be discussed. Oral presentations will be limited to issues raised in the briefs. If a request for a hearing is made, parties will be notified of the time and date for the hearing to be held at the U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.[13]
The Department intends to issue the final results of these new shipper reviews, which will include the results of its analysis of issues raised in all comments and at any hearing, within 90 days of publication of these preliminary results, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Act.
Assessment Rates
Upon completion of the final results, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b), the Department will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries. If we proceed to a final rescission of these new shipper reviews, Nam Phuong's and NTACO's entries will be assessed at the rate entered.[14]
If we do not proceed to a final rescission of these new shipper reviews, pursuant to 19 CFR 351.212(b)(1), we will calculate importer-specific (or customer) assessment rates on a per unit basis.[15]
We will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by these reviews if any importer-specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of these reviews is above
de minimis.[16]
In either case, the Department intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of the final results in the
Federal Register
. The final results of these reviews shall be the basis for the assessment of antidumping duties on entries of merchandise covered by the final results of these reviews and for future deposits of estimated duties, where applicable.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Effective upon publication of the final rescission or the final results of these new shipper reviews, pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iii) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214(e), the Department will instruct CBP to discontinue the option of posting a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of subject merchandise by Nam Phuong and NTACO. If the Department proceeds to a final rescission of these new shipper reviews, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the per-unit Vietnam-wide rate for Nam Phuong and NTACO because the Department will not have determined an individual margin of dumping for Nam Phuong and NTACO. If the Department issues final results for these new shipper reviews, the Department will instruct CBP to collect cash deposits, effective upon the publication of the final results, at the rates established therein.
Notification to Interested Parties
This notice serves as a preliminary reminder to importers of their
( printed page 4546)
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f)(2) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this POR. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties.
We are issuing and publishing this determination in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i)(1) of the Act.
Dated: January 20, 2015.
Paul Piquado,
Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix
List of Topics Discussed in the Preliminary Decision Memorandum
1. Summary
2. Background
3. Scope of the Order
4.
Bona Fides
Analysis
5. Conclusion
Footnotes
1.
See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Initiation of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews;
2013-2014, 79 FR 18666 (April 3, 2014).
2.
See
Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Senior Advisor for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, through James C. Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Steven Hampton, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, regarding Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews of Nam Phuong Seafood Co., Ltd. and NTACO Corporation, dated August 20, 2014.
3.
See
Memorandum to Gary Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, through James C. Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Steven Hampton, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations regarding Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Full Extension of Deadline for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews of Nam Phuong Seafood Co., Ltd. and NTACO Corporation, dated October 29, 2014.
5.
Until July 1, 2004, these products were classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6030 (Frozen Catfish Fillets), 0304.20.6096 (Frozen Fish Fillets, NESOI), 0304.20.6043 (Frozen Freshwater Fish Fillets) and 0304.20.6057 (Frozen Sole Fillets). Until February 1, 2007, these products were classifiable under HTSUS 0304.20.6033 (Frozen Fish Fillets of the species
Pangasius,
including basa and tra). On March 2, 2011, the Department added two HTSUS numbers at the request of U.S. Customs and Border Protection (“CBP”): 1604.19.2000 and 1604 19.3000. On January 30, 2012, the Department added eight HTSUS numbers at the request of CBP: 0304.62.0020, 0305.59.0000, 1604.19.2100, 1604.19.3100, 1604.19.4100, 1604.19.5100, 1604.19.6100 and 1604.19.8100.
6.
See
“Decision Memorandum for Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews: Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist's Republic of Vietnam” from Gary
Taverman, Associate Deputy Assistant Secretary for Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, to Paul Piquado, Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance, dated January 20, 2015 (“Preliminary Decision Memorandum”), which is hereby adopted by this notice, for a complete description of the Scope of the Order.
7.
On November 24, 2014, Enforcement and Compliance changed the name of its centralized electronic service system to ACCESS. The Web site location was changed from
http://iaaccess.trade.gov
to
http://access.trade.gov.
The Final Rule changing the references to the centralized electronic service system to ACCESS in the Department's regulations can be found at 79 FR 69046 (November 20, 2014).
8.
See
Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, through Scot T. Fullerton, Program Manager, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, From Matthew Renkey, Senior International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office V, titled “New Shipper Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets from the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Bona Fide
Nature of Nam Phuong Seafood Co., Ltd.'s Sale,” dated concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice; Memorandum to James C. Doyle, Director, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, through Scot T. Fullerton, Program Manager, Office V, Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Operations, from Steven Hampton, International Trade Compliance Analyst, Office V, titled “New Shipper Review of Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam:
Bona Fide
Nature of NTACO Corporation's Sale,” dated concurrently and hereby adopted by this notice.
15.
In the third administrative review, the Department determined that it would calculate per-unit assessment and cash deposit rates for all future reviews.
See Certain Frozen Fish Fillets From the Socialist Republic of Vietnam: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Partial Rescission,73 FR 15479 (March 24, 2008).