Skip to Content

Rule

Air Quality Designations for the 2012 Primary Annual Fine Particle (PM2.5

This document was corrected by an document published on 09/22/2016. View Correction

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble

AGENCY:

Environmental Protection Agency.

ACTION:

Final rule.

SUMMARY:

The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) is establishing air quality designations in the United States (U.S.) for the 2012 primary annual fine particle (PM2.5) National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) for three areas in Georgia and 62 counties in Florida. When the EPA designated the majority of areas in the country in December 2014, and March 2015, the EPA deferred initial area designations for several locations, including these areas, because the EPA could not determine using available data whether the areas were meeting or not meeting the NAAQS, but we believed that forthcoming data in 2015 would allow the EPA to make that determination. Georgia and Florida have recently submitted complete, quality-assured, and certified air quality monitoring data for 2015 for the areas identified in this notice, and based on these data, the EPA is designating these areas as unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS.

DATES:

This final rule is effective on October 6, 2016.

ADDRESSES:

The EPA has established a docket for this action under Docket ID No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0918. All documents in the docket are listed in the http://www.regulations.gov Web site. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., Confidential Business Information or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Certain other material, such as copyrighted material, is not placed on the Internet and will be publicly available only in hard copy form. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in http://www.regulations.gov.

In addition, the EPA has established a Web site for the rulemakings to initially designate areas for the 2012 primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS at: https://www3.epa.gov/​pmdesignations/​2012standards/​index.htm. This Web site includes the EPA's final area designations for the PM2.5 NAAQS, as well as state and tribal initial recommendation letters, the EPA's modification letters, technical support documents, responses to comments and other related technical information.

Start Further Info

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

For general questions concerning this action, please contact Carla Oldham, U.S. EPA, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Air Quality Planning Division, C539-04, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, telephone (919) 541-3347, email at oldham.carla@epa.gov. The Region 4 contact is Madolyn Sanchez, U.S. EPA, Air Regulatory Management Section, Air Planning and Implementation Branch, Air, Pesticides and Toxics Management Division, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303-8960, telephone (404) 562-9644, email at sanchez.madolyn@epa.gov.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Background

On December 14, 2012, the EPA promulgated a revised primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS to provide increased protection of public health from fine particle pollution (78 FR 3086; January 15, 2013). In that action, the EPA strengthened the primary annual PM2.5 standard from 15.0 micrograms per cubic meter (μg/m3) to 12.0 μg/m3, which is attained when the 3-year average of the annual arithmetic means does not exceed 12.0 μg/m3.

Section 107(d) of the Clean Air Act (CAA), 42 U.S.C. 7407(d), governs the process for initial area designations after the EPA establishes a new or revised NAAQS. Under CAA section 107(d), each governor is required to, and each tribal leader may, if they so choose, recommend air quality designations, including the appropriate boundaries for “nonattainment” areas, to the EPA by a date which cannot be later than 1 year after the promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS. The EPA considers these recommendations as part of its duty to promulgate the area designations and boundaries for the new or revised NAAQS. If, after careful consideration of these recommendations, the EPA believes that it is necessary to modify a state's recommendation and intends to promulgate a designation different from a state's recommendation, the EPA must notify the state at least 120 days prior to promulgating the final designation and the EPA must provide the state an opportunity to demonstrate why any proposed modification is inappropriate. These modifications may relate either to an area's designation or boundaries.

On December 18, 2014, the Administrator of the EPA signed a final action promulgating initial designations for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for the majority of the U.S., including areas of Indian country (80 FR 2206 FR; January 15, 2015). That action designated 14 areas in six states, including two multi-state areas, as nonattainment for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS. The EPA also designated three areas, including the entire state of Illinois, as “unclassifiable” because the ambient air quality monitoring sites in these areas lacked complete data for the relevant period from 2011-2013. In the absence of complete monitoring data, the EPA could not determine, based on available information, whether these areas meet or do not meet the NAAQS, and also could not determine whether these areas contribute to a nearby violation. Consistent with the EPA's “Policy for Establishing Separate Air Quality Designations for Areas of Indian Country” (December 20, 2011), the EPA designated the lands of the Pechanga Band of Luiseño Mission Indians in Southern California as an unclassifiable/attainment area separate from its adjacent/surrounding state areas. Except for the 10 areas discussed in the next paragraph, the EPA designated all the remaining state areas and areas of Indian country as unclassifiable/attainment.

The EPA deferred initial area designations for 10 areas where available data, including air quality monitoring data, were insufficient to determine whether the areas met or did not meet the NAAQS, but where forthcoming data were likely to result in complete and valid air quality data sufficient to determine whether these areas meet the NAAQS. Accordingly, the EPA stated that it would use the additional time available as provided under section 107(d)(1)(B) of the CAA to assess relevant information and subsequently promulgate initial designations for the identified areas through a separate rulemaking action or actions. The 10 deferred areas included: Eight areas in the state of Georgia, including two neighboring counties in the bordering states of Alabama and South Carolina; the entire state of Tennessee, excluding three counties in Start Printed Page 61137the Chattanooga area; the entire state of Florida; and areas of Indian country located in these areas.

In the action published on January 15, 2015, the EPA also described a process by which we would evaluate any complete, quality-assured, certified air quality monitoring data from 2014 that a state submitted for consideration before February 27, 2015 (80 FR 2209). The EPA stated that it would evaluate whether, with the inclusion of certified 2014 data, the 3-year design value for 2012-2014 suggests that a change in the initial designation would be appropriate for an area. If the EPA agreed that a change in the initial designation would be appropriate, the EPA would withdraw the designation announced in the January 15, 2015, action for such area before the effective date and issue another designation reflecting the inclusion of 2014 data (80 FR 2209).

In the follow-up designation action, published on April 15, 2015 (80 FR 18535), the EPA designated five areas in the state of Georgia, including two neighboring counties in the bordering states of Alabama and South Carolina, that were initially deferred in the EPA's January 15, 2015, rulemaking. In the same action, the EPA changed the designation of one area in Ohio, two areas in Pennsylvania, one area shared between Indiana and Kentucky, and one area shared between Kentucky and Ohio. Following that action, designations remained deferred for three areas (covering 14 counties) in Georgia, the entire state of Tennessee (covering 92 counties, excluding three counties in the Chattanooga area), the entire state of Florida (covering 67 counties), and areas of Indian country located in those areas.

II. Purpose and Designation Decisions Based on 2013-2015 Data

The purpose of this action is to announce and promulgate initial area designations of unclassifiable/attainment for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS for three areas in Georgia,[1] 62 counties in Florida, and Indian country located at least partially in these areas. All of these areas were initially deferred in the EPA's January 15, 2015, rulemaking.[2] Since then, the states of Georgia and Florida submitted to the EPA complete, quality-assured, and certified air quality monitoring data from 2013-2015 for these deferred areas. These data provide the EPA with sufficient information to promulgate initial designations for the three areas in Georgia, 62 counties in Florida, and the associated areas of Indian country at issue in this action. Air quality data collected and submitted to the EPA for 2013-2015 for these areas indicate that the areas are attaining the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS and are not causing or contributing to a violation of the NAAQS in a nearby area. Therefore, the EPA is designating the three areas in Georgia as unclassifiable/attainment. Also, consistent with the EPA's practice in prior rounds of initial area designations for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS, EPA is designating 62 counties in Florida as unclassifiable/attainment.[3] Areas of Indian country located in these areas are also being designated as unclassifiable/attainment. These designations are consistent with Georgia's and Florida's recommended area designations and boundaries for these areas for the 2012 PM2.5 standard. The tables at the end of this final rule (amendments to 40 CFR 81.310—Florida and 40 CFR 81.311—Georgia) list all areas for which the EPA has promulgated an initial designation in each of these two states. Areas of Indian country located in the listed areas are included in the designated area.

III. Environmental Justice Considerations

The CAA requires the EPA to determine through a designation process whether an area meets or does not meet any new or revised national primary or secondary ambient air quality standard. This action includes initial designation determinations for several areas of the U.S. for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS. Area designations ensure that the public is properly informed about the air quality in an area and that, in locations where air quality does not meet the NAAQS, the relevant state authorities are required to initiate appropriate air quality management actions under the CAA to ensure that all those residing, working, attending school or otherwise present in those areas are protected, regardless of minority and economic status.

IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews

A. Executive Order 12866: Regulatory Planning and Review and Executive Order 13563: Improving Regulation and Regulatory Review

This action is exempt from review by the Office of Management and Budget because it responds to the CAA requirement to promulgate air quality designations after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS.

B. Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA)

This action does not impose an information collection burden under the PRA. This action fulfills the non-discretionary duty for the EPA to promulgate air quality designations after promulgation of a new or revised NAAQS and does not contain any information collection activities.

C. Regulatory Flexibility Act (RFA)

This designation action under CAA 107(d) is not subject to the RFA. The RFA applies only to rules subject to notice and comment rulemaking requirements under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), 5 U.S.C. 553, or any other statute. Section 107(d)(2)(B) of the CAA explicitly provides that designations are exempt from the notice and comment provisions of the APA. In addition, designations under section 107(d) are not among the list of actions that are subject to the notice and comment procedures of CAA section 307(d).

D. Unfunded Mandates Reform Act (UMRA)

This action does not contain any unfunded mandate as described in UMRA, 2 U.S.C. 1531-1538 and does not significantly or uniquely affect small governments. The action implements mandates specifically and explicitly set forth in the CAA for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS (40 CFR 50.18). The CAA establishes the process whereby states take primary responsibility for developing plans to meet the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS.

E. Executive Order 13132: Federalism

This action does not have federalism implications. It will not have a substantial direct effects on the states, on the relationship between the national government and the states, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the various levels of government.Start Printed Page 61138

F. Executive Order 13175: Consultation and Coordination With Indian Tribal Governments

This action has tribal implications. However, it will neither impose substantial direct compliance costs on federally recognized tribal governments, nor preempt tribal law. Areas of Indian country are being designated unclassifiable/attainment as part of this action.

The EPA offered consultation to tribal officials under the EPA Policy on Consultation and Coordination with Indian Tribes early in the process to designate areas for the 2012 PM2.5 NAAQS to permit them to have meaningful and timely input. In letters dated May 29, 2014, the EPA encouraged tribes to participate in the designations process, request consultation, and submit recommendations. The EPA again offered the opportunity for consultation in letters sent on August 19, 2014. The Seminole Tribe of Florida, which has areas of Indian country affected by this designation action, did not request consultation, nor did they provide a recommendation for designations. Therefore, the EPA did not initiate the consultation process with the tribe for this designation action.

G. Executive Order 13045: Protection of Children From Environmental Health and Safety Risks

The EPA interprets Executive Order 13045 as applying to those regulatory actions that concern environmental health or safety risks that the EPA has reason to believe may disproportionately affect children, per the definition of “covered regulatory action” in section 2-202 of the Executive Order. This action is not subject to Executive Order 13045 because it does not establish an environmental standard intended to mitigate health or safety risks.

H. Executive Order 13211: Actions That Significantly Affect Energy Supply, Distribution or Use

This action is not subject to Executive Order 13211, because it is not a significant regulatory action under Executive Order 12866.

I. National Technology Transfer and Advancement Act (NTTAA)

This rulemaking does not involve technical standards.

J. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions To Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations

The EPA believes the human health or environmental risk addressed by this action will not have potential disproportionately high and adverse human health or environmental effects on any population, including any minority, low-income or indigenous populations because it does not affect the level of protection provided to human health or the environment. The results of this evaluation of environmental justice considerations is contained in Section III of this preamble titled, “Environmental Justice Considerations.”

K. Congressional Review Act (CRA)

This action is subject to the CRA, and the EPA will submit a rule report to each House of the Congress and to the Comptroller General of the U.S. This action is not a “major rule” as defined by 5 U.S.C. 804(2).

L. Judicial Review

Section 307(b)(1) of the CAA indicates which Federal Courts of Appeal have venue for petitions of review of final actions by the EPA. This section provides, in part, that petitions for review must be filed in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit: (i) When the agency action consists of “nationally applicable regulations promulgated, or final actions taken by the Administrator,” or (ii) when such action is locally or regionally applicable, if “such action is based on a determination of nationwide scope or effect and if in taking such action the Administrator finds and publishes that such action is based on such a determination.”

This final action designating areas across the U.S. for the 2012 annual PM2.5 NAAQS is “nationally applicable” within the meaning of CAA section 307(b)(1). At the core of this final action is the EPA's interpretations of the definitions of nonattainment, attainment and unclassifiable under section 107(d)(1) of the CAA, and its application of those interpretations to areas across the country. For the same reasons, the Administrator is also determining that the final designations are of nationwide scope and effect for the purposes of CAA section 307(b)(1). This is particularly appropriate because, in the report on the 1977 Amendments that revised section 307(b)(1) of the CAA, Congress noted that the Administrator's determination that an action is of “nationwide scope or effect” would be appropriate for any action that has a scope or effect beyond a single judicial circuit. H.R. Rep. No. 95-294 at 323, 324, reprinted in 1977 U.S.C.C.A.N. 1402-03. Here, the scope and effect of this final action extends to numerous judicial circuits since the designations apply to areas across the country. In these circumstances, CAA section 307(b)(1) and its legislative history calls for the Administrator to find the action to be of “nationwide scope or effect” and for venue to be in the D.C. Circuit.

Thus, any petitions for review of final designations must be filed in the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit within 60 days from the date final action is published in the Federal Register.

Start List of Subjects

List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 81

  • Environmental protection
  • Air pollution control
  • National parks
  • Wilderness areas
End List of Subjects Start Signature

Dated: August 30, 2016.

Gina McCarthy,

Administrator.

End Signature

For the reasons set forth in the preamble, 40 CFR part 81 is amended as follows:

Start Part

PART 81—DESIGNATIONS OF AREAS FOR AIR QUALITY PLANNING PURPOSES

End Part Start Amendment Part

1. The authority citation for part 81 continues to read as follows:

End Amendment Part Start Authority

Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401, et. seq.

End Authority

Subpart C—Section 107 Attainment Status Designations

Start Amendment Part

2. Section 81.310 is amended by revising the table entitled “Florida—2012 Annual PM 2.5 NAAQS (Primary)” to read as follows:

End Amendment Part
Florida.
* * * * *
Start Printed Page 61139

Florida—2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS

[Primary]

Designated area 1DesignationClassification
Date 2TypeDate 2Type
Statewide:
Alachua County
Baker CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Bay CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Bradford CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Brevard CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Broward County
Calhoun CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Charlotte CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Citrus CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Clay CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Collier CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Columbia CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
DeSoto CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Dixie CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Duval CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Escambia CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Flagler CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Franklin CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Gadsden CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Gilchrist County
Glades CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Gulf CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Hamilton CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Hardee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Hendry County 3Unclassifiable/Attainment.
Hernando CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Highlands CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Hillsborough CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Holmes CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Indian River CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Jackson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Jefferson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Lafayette CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Lake CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Lee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Leon CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Levy CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Liberty CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Madison CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Manatee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Marion CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Martin CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Miami-Dade County
Monroe CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Nassau CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Okaloosa CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Okeechobee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Orange CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Osceola CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Palm Beach County
Pasco CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Pinellas CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Polk CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Putnam CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
St. Johns CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
St. Lucie CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Santa Rosa CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Sarasota CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Seminole CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Sumter CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Suwanee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Taylor CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Union CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Volusia CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Wakulla CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Walton CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
Washington CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment.
1 Includes areas of Indian country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.Start Printed Page 61140
2 This date is October 6, 2016, unless otherwise noted.
3 Includes the Seminole Tribe of Florida Big Cypress Indian Reservation in its entirety.
* * * * *
Start Amendment Part

3. Section 81.311 is amended by revising the table entitled “Georgia—2012 Annual PM 2.5 NAAQS (Primary)” to read as follows:

End Amendment Part
Georgia.
* * * * *

Georgia—2012 Annual PM2.5 NAAQS

[Primary]

Designated area 1DesignationClassification
Date 2TypeDate 2Type
Statewide:
Appling CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Atkinson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Bacon CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Baker CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Baldwin CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Banks CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Barrow CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Bartow CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Ben Hill CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Berrien CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Bibb CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Bleckley CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Brantley CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Brooks CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Bryan CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Bulloch CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Burke CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Butts CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Calhoun CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Camden CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Candler CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Carroll CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Catoosa CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Charlton CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Chatham CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Chattahoochee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Chattooga CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Cherokee CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Clarke CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Clay CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Clayton CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Clinch CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Cobb CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Coffee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Colquitt CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Columbia CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Cook CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Coweta CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Crawford CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Crisp CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Dade CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Dawson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Decatur CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
DeKalb CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Dodge CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Dooly CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Dougherty CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Douglas CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Early CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Echols CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Effingham CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Elbert CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Emanuel CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Evans CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Fannin CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Fayette CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Floyd CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Forsyth CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Franklin CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Fulton CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Start Printed Page 61141
Gilmer CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Glascock CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Glynn CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Gordon CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Grady CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Greene County
Gwinnett CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Habersham CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Hall CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Hancock CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Haralson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Harris CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Hart CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Heard CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Henry CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Houston CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Irwin CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Jackson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Jasper CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Jeff Davis CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Jefferson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Jenkins CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Johnson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Jones CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Lamar CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Lanier CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Laurens CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Lee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Liberty CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Lincoln CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Long CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Lowndes CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Lumpkin CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
McDuffie CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
McIntosh CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Macon CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Madison CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Marion CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Meriwether CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Miller CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Mitchell CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Monroe CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Montgomery CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Morgan CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Murray CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Muscogee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Newton CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Oconee CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Oglethorpe CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Paulding CountyOctober 6, 2016Unclassifiable/Attainment
Peach CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Pickens CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Pierce CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Pike CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Polk CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Pulaski CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Putnam CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Quitman CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Rabun CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Randolph CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Richmond CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Rockdale CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Schley CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Screven CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Seminole CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Spalding CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Stephens CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Stewart CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Sumter CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Start Printed Page 61142
Talbot CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Taliaferro CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Tattnall CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Taylor CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Telfair CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Terrell CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Thomas CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Tift CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Toombs CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Towns CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Treutlen CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Troup CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Turner CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Twiggs CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Union CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Upson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Walker CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Walton CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Ware CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Warren CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Washington CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Wayne CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Webster CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Wheeler CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
White CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Whitfield CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Wilcox CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Wilkes CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Wilkinson CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
Worth CountyUnclassifiable/Attainment
1 Includes areas of Indian country located in each county or area, except as otherwise specified.
2 This date is April 15, 2015, unless otherwise noted.
* * * * *
End Supplemental Information

Footnotes

1.  The areas in Georgia are Albany (Dougherty County); Atlanta (Bartow, Cherokee, Clayton, Cobb, Coweta, DeKalb, Douglas, Forsyth, Fulton, Gwinnett, Henry, and Paulding Counties); and Brunswick (Glynn County).

Back to Citation

2.  See also the technical support documents for the deferred Georgia and Florida areas in the rulemaking docket, documents numbered EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0918-0324 and EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0918-0156 (Georgia); and EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0918-0323 and EPA-HQ-2012-0918-0332 (Florida).

Back to Citation

3.  The EPA has used a weight-of-evidence evaluation to determine an appropriate designation for counties that are adjacent to areas that remain undesignated. See Docket No. EPA-HQ-OAR-2012-0918-0324, Georgia Deferred Area Memorandum, discussing certain types of counties “most likely to contribute to a violation of the NAAQS”.

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2016-21338 Filed 9-2-16; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 6560-50-P