This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 10/07/2016 at 08:45 am.
Pursuant to Section 19(b)(1)  of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Act”)  and Rule 19b-4 thereunder, notice is hereby given that, on September 26, 2016, NYSE Arca, Inc. (the “Exchange” or “NYSE Arca”) filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) the proposed rule change as described in Items I and II below, which Items have been prepared by the self-regulatory organization. The Commission is publishing this notice to solicit comments on the proposed rule change from interested persons.
I. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Terms of Substance of the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.16P. The proposed rule change is available on the Exchange's Web site at www.nyse.com, at the principal office of the Exchange, and at the Commission's Public Reference Room.
In its filing with the Commission, the self-regulatory organization included statements concerning the purpose of, and basis for, the proposed rule change and discussed any comments it received on the proposed rule change. The text of those statements may be examined at the places specified in Item IV below. The Exchange has prepared summaries, set forth in sections A, B, and C below, of the most significant parts of such statements.
A. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement of the Purpose of, and the Statutory Basis for, the Proposed Rule Change
The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.16P (Short Sales). Specifically, the Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.16P(f)(5)(G) regarding the treatment of an Intermarket Sweep Order (“ISO”)  designated Immediate-or-Cancel (“IOC”) during a Short Sale Period. Rule 7.16P(f)(5)(F) currently provides that during a Short Sale Period, IOC orders will be traded to the extent possible at a Permitted Price  and higher and then cancelled, and the working price will not be adjusted. An IOC ISO with a limit price at or below the NBB, on the other hand, is treated unlike an IOC order during a Short Sale Period and similar to a Day ISO. Rule 7.16P(f)(5)(G) currently provides that a Day ISO will be rejected if the limit price is at or below the NBB. The Exchange proposes to amend Rule 7.16P(f)(5)(G) to specify that an IOC ISO and a Day ISO are both handled in a similar manner by the Exchange. The Exchange proposes to make this change by deleting the word `Day' from Rule 7.16P(f)(5)(G). Given that during a Short Sale Period, an IOC ISO and a Day ISO are both treated in a similar manner, the Exchange believes the proposed change will provide specificity to the Exchange's rules that during a Short Sale Period, all ISOs will be rejected if the limit price is at or below the NBB.
2. Statutory Basis
The proposed rule change is consistent with Section 6(b) of the Act, in general, and furthers the objectives of Section 6(b)(5), in particular, because it is designed to prevent fraudulent and manipulative acts and practices, to promote just and equitable principles of trade, to foster cooperation and coordination with persons engaged in facilitating transactions in securities, to remove impediments to, and perfect the mechanism of, a free and open market and a national market system and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
Specifically, the Exchange believes that the proposed rule change would promote just and equitable principles of Start Printed Page 70227trade, and remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system by ensuring consistency in the treatment of ISOs during a Short Sale Period. The Exchange believes the proposal to amend Rule 7.16P will also promote transparency and provide specificity to the rule, which serves to remove impediments to and perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and a national market system, and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest.
B. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Burden on Competition
The Exchange does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. The proposed change is not designed to address any competitive issue but rather to make amendments to the manner in which ISOs are handled during a Short Sale Period.
C. Self-Regulatory Organization's Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others
No written comments were solicited or received with respect to the proposed rule change.
III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action
Because the proposed rule change does not (i) significantly affect the protection of investors or the public interest; (ii) impose any significant burden on competition; and (iii) become operative for 30 days from the date on which it was filed, or such shorter time as the Commission may designate, it has become effective pursuant to Section 19(b)(3)(A) of the Act  and Rule 19b-4(f)(6) thereunder.
A proposed rule change filed pursuant to Rule 19b-4(f)(6) under the Act  normally does not become operative for 30 days after the date of its filing. However, Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii)  permits the Commission to designate a shorter time if such action is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. The Exchange has asked the Commission to waive the 30-day operative delay so that the proposal may become operative immediately upon filing. According to the Exchange, during a Short Sale Period, IOC ISOs and Day ISOs are treated in a similar manner, and the proposed rule change would specify that during a Short Sale Period, all ISOs will be rejected if the limit price is at or below the NBB. The Commission believes the waiver of the operative delay is consistent with the protection of investors and the public interest. Therefore, the Commission hereby waives the operative delay and designates the proposal operative upon filing.
At any time within 60 days of the filing of the proposed rule change, the Commission summarily may temporarily suspend such rule change if it appears to the Commission that such action is necessary or appropriate in the public interest, for the protection of investors, or otherwise in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. If the Commission takes such action, the Commission shall institute proceedings to determine whether the proposed rule change should be approved or disapproved.
IV. Solicitation of Comments
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods:
- Use the Commission's Internet comment form (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml); or
- Send an email to email@example.com. Please include File Number SR-NYSEArca-2016-134 on the subject line.
- Send paper comments in triplicate to Brent J. Fields, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549-1090.
All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2016-134. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission's Internet Web site (http://www.sec.gov/rules/sro.shtml). Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission's Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549 on official business days between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of the Exchange. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR-NYSEArca-2016-134 and should be submitted on or before November 1, 2016.Start Signature
For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.
Robert W. Errett,
4. An ISO is a Limit Order that does not route and meets the requirements of Rule 600(b)(30) of Regulation NMS. See Rule 7.31P(e)(3).Back to Citation
5. Short Sale Period is the period of time that the Short Sale Price Test remains in effect if the Short Sale Price Test is triggered by the listing market with respect to a covered security. See Rule 7.16P(f)(4).Back to Citation
6. Permitted Price is the working price and/or display price adjusted one minimum price increment above the current NBB for short sale orders during a Short Sale Period that have a working price and/or display price equal to or lower than the NBB. See Rule 7.16P(f)(5)(A).Back to Citation
7. See Rule 7.16P(f)(5)(F).Back to Citation
8. The Exchange proposes a non-substantive amendment to delete the term “Order” in Rule 7.16P(f)(5)(G) as such term is redundant of the term ISO, which includes the term “Order.”Back to Citation
12. 17 CFR 240.19b-4(f)(6). As required under Rule 19b-4(f)(6)(iii), the Exchange provided the Commission with written notice of its intent to file the proposed rule change, along with a brief description and the text of the proposed rule change, at least five business days prior to the date of filing of the proposed rule change, or such shorter time as designated by the Commission.Back to Citation
15. For purposes only of waiving the 30-day operative delay, the Commission has also considered the proposed rule's impact on efficiency, competition, and capital formation. See 15 U.S.C. 78c(f).Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 2016-24419 Filed 10-7-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 8011-01-P