This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
182
as of
08/13/2026 at 4:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2016-25901 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
10/25/2016 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2016-25901 (81 FR 74393)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
The Department of Commerce (Department) finds that the sale made by Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (Zhangshi) and the sale made by Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd. (Muyun) are non-
bona fide.
Therefore, we are rescinding these new shipper reviews (NSRs).
DATES:
Effective October 26, 2016.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert Galantucci (202-482-2923) or Aleksandras Nakutis (202-482-3147), AD/CVD Operations, Office IV, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW., Washington, DC 20230.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The Department published its
Preliminary Rescission
of the NSRs of the antidumping duty order on multilayered wood flooring from the People's Republic of China (PRC) on May 31, 2016.[1]
We preliminarily found that the sale made by Zhangshi and the sale made by Muyun were not
bona fide,
and announced our preliminary intent to rescind the NSRs.
For a complete description of the events that followed the publication of the
Preliminary Rescission,
see the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.[2]
The
Issues and Decision Memorandum
is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping Duty (AD) and Countervailing Duty (CVD) Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at
http://access.trade.gov
and in the Central Records Unit, room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum
can be accessed directly at
http://enforcement.trade.gov/frn/index.html.
The signed
Issues and Decision Memorandum
and the electronic version of the
Issues and Decision Memorandum
are identical in content.
Scope of the Order
The merchandise covered by the order is multilayered wood flooring, which is
( printed page 74394)
composed of an assembly of two or more layers or plies of wood veneers [3]
in combination with a core.[4]
Merchandise covered by this review is classifiable under subheadings 4412.31.0520; 4412.31.0540; 4412.31.0560; 4412.31.2510; 4412.31.2520; 4412.31.4040; 4412.31.4050; 4412.31.4060; 4412.31.4070; 4412.31.4075; 4412.31.4080; 4412.31.5125; 4412.31.5135; 4412.31.5155; 4412.31.5165; 4412.31.6000; 4412.31.9100; 4412.32.0520; 4412.32.0540; 4412.32.0560; 4412.32.0565; 4412.32.0570; 4412.32.2510; 4412.32.2520; 4412.32.2525; 4412.32.2530; 4412.32.3125; 4412.32.3135; 4412.32.3155; 4412.32.3165; 4412.32.3175; 4412.32.3185; 4412.32.5600; 4412.39.1000; 4412.39.3000; 4412.39.4011; 4412.39.4012; 4412.39.4019; 4412.39.4031; 4412.39.4032; 4412.39.4039; 4412.39.4051; 4412.39.4052; 4412.39.4059; 4412.39.4061; 4412.39.4062; 4412.39.4069; 4412.39.5010; 4412.39.5030; 4412.39.5050; 4412.94.1030; 4412.94.1050; 4412.94.3105; 4412.94.3111; 4412.94.3121; 4412.94.3131; 4412.94.3141; 4412.94.3160; 4412.94.3171; 4412.94.4100; 4412.94.5100; 4412.94.6000; 4412.94.7000; 4412.94.8000; 4412.94.9000; 4412.94.9500; 4412.99.0600; 4412.99.1020; 4412.99.1030; 4412.99.1040; 4412.99.3110; 4412.99.3120; 4412.99.3130; 4412.99.3140; 4412.99.3150; 4412.99.3160; 4412.99.3170; 4412.99.4100; 4412.99.5100; 4412.99.5105; 4412.99.5115; 4412.99.5710; 4412.99.6000; 4412.99.7000; 4412.99.8000; 4412.99.9000; 4412.99.9500; 4418.71.2000; 4418.71.9000; 4418.72.2000; 4418.72.9500; and 9801.00.2500 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of the order is dispositive.
Analysis of Comments Received
All issues raised in the case briefs by parties are addressed in the
Issues and Decision Memorandum.[5]
A list of the issues which parties raised is attached to this notice as an Appendix.
Bona Fide
Analysis
For the
Preliminary Rescission,
the Department analyzed the
bona fides
of Zhangshi's single sale and Muyun's single sale and preliminarily found that they were not
bona fide
sales.[6]
Based on the Department's complete analysis of all of the information and comments on the record of this review, the Department continues to find Zhangshi's and Muyun's sales not
bona fide,
and thus not reviewable pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(B)(iv) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). The Department reached this conclusion with respect to Zhangshi based on its consideration of the totality of circumstances, including: The sale price, the timing of the payment, a comparison between the payment and the invoiced amount, the parties' implementation of the terms of sale, statements regarding the customer/importer's affiliations, and the single sale. The Department reached this conclusion with respect to Muyun based on its consideration of the totality of circumstances, including: The sale price, the timing of the payment, and the single sale. For a complete discussion,
see
the
Issues and Decision Memorandum
as well as the
BPI Discussion of Zhangshi's Comments
and the
BPI Discussion of Muyun's Comments.
Rescission of New Shipper Reviews
For the foregoing reasons, the Department continues to find that Zhangshi's sale and Muyun's sale are not
bona fide,
and that the sales do not provide a reasonable or reliable basis for calculating a dumping margin. Accordingly, the Department is rescinding these NSRs.
Assessment
As the Department is rescinding these NSRs, we are not making a determination as to whether or not Zhangshi or Muyun qualify for a separate rate. Therefore, these companies remain part of the PRC-entity. The PRC-entity is not under review in the ongoing review covering the 2014-2015 period. Accordingly, these companies' entries will be assessed at rates equal to the cash deposit of, or bond for, estimated antidumping duties required on their merchandise at the time of entry, or withdrawal from warehouse, for consumption. The Department intends to issue liquidation instructions for any entries during the relevant period made by Zhangshi and Muyun 15 days after publication of this rescission notice.
Cash Deposit Requirements
Effective upon publication of this notice of final rescission of the NSRs of Zhangshi and Muyun, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to discontinue the option of posting a bond or security in lieu of a cash deposit for entries of subject merchandise from Zhangshi and Muyun.[7]
Because we did not review Zhangshi or Muyun, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect the cash deposit previously ordered which was the cash deposit rate for the PRC-wide entity of 25.62 percent. These cash deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to Administrative Protective Order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in these segments of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return or destruction of APO materials, or conversion to judicial protective order, is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.
We are issuing and publishing this notice in accordance with sections 751(a)(2)(B) and 777(i) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.214.
Dated: October 17, 2016.
Ronald K. Lorentzen,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Appendix—Issues and Decision Memorandum
Summary
Background
Scope of the Order
( printed page 74395)
Discussion of the Issues
Comment 1:
Whether the Department should revise its analysis with respect to Zhangshi's sales price and quantity.
Comment 2:
Whether the Department should revise its analysis regarding Zhangshi's customer's resale of the subject merchandise.
Comment 3:
Whether the Department should revise its analysis regarding Zhangshi's implementation of the terms of sale.
Comment 4:
Whether the Department should revise its analysis regarding the circumstances surrounding Zhangshi's receipt of payment.
Comment 5:
Whether the Department made procedural errors in conducting this review.
Comment 6:
Whether Muyun's sale was resold at a profit.
Comment 7:
Whether the timing of Muyun's sale was consistent with normal commercial practices.
Comment 8:
Whether Muyun's sale price was based on normal commercial considerations.
Comment 9:
Whether the totality of the circumstances indicates that Muyun's sale was
bona fide.
Recommendation
Footnotes
1.
See Multilayered Wood Flooring From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Rescission of 2014-2015 Antidumping Duty New Shipper Reviews,81 FR 34310 (May 31, 2016) (
Preliminary Rescission);
see also
Memorandum from Robert Galantucci to Abdelali Elouaradia, “Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Bona Fide Sale Analysis for Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Ltd.,” dated May 20, 2016 (
Zhangshi Prelim Bona Fide Memo); Memorandum from Aleksandras Nakutis to Abdelali Elouaradia, “Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review of Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Bona Fide Sale Analysis for Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd.,” dated May 20, 2016 (
Muyun Prelim Bona Fide Memo).
2.
See
Memorandum from Christian Marsh to Ronald K. Lorentzen, “Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Rescission of the 2014-2015 New Shipper Reviews” issued concurrently with and hereby adopted by this notice (
Issues and Decision Memorandum).
5.
See Issues and Decision Memorandum.
The Department has also issued business proprietary discussions of the comments raised, as many of the comments relied heavily on business proprietary information (BPI).
See
Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, “Final Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review—Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Business Proprietary Information Discussion of the Comments Regarding Dongtai Zhangshi Wood Industry Co., Ltd.,” dated October 17, 2016 (
BPI Discussion of Zhangshi's Comments); Memorandum to Abdelali Elouaradia, “Final Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review—Multilayered Wood Flooring from the People's Republic of China: Business Proprietary Information Discussion of the Comments Regarding Huzhou Muyun Wood Co., Ltd.,” dated October 17, 2016 (
BPI Discussion of Muyun's Comments).