This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 01/05/2017 at 08:45 am.
Postal Regulatory Commission.
The Postal Service has filed an Annual Compliance Report on the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with its products in fiscal year 2016. Within 90 days, the Commission must evaluate that information and issue its determination as to whether rates were in compliance with title 39, chapter 36, and whether service standards in effect were met. To assist in this, the Commission seeks public comments on the Postal Service's Annual Compliance Report.
Comments are due: February 2, 2017.
Reply Comments are due: February 13, 2017.
Submit comments electronically via the Commission's Filing Online system at http://www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit comments electronically should contact the person identified in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section by telephone for advice on filing alternatives.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at 202-789-6820.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
Table of Contents
II. Overview of the Postal Service's FY 2016 ACR
III. Procedural Steps
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
On December 29, 2016, the United States Postal Service (Postal Service) filed with the Commission, pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 3652, its Annual Compliance Report (ACR) for fiscal year (FY) 2016. Section 3652 requires submission of data and information on the costs, revenues, rates, and quality of service associated with postal products within 90 days of the closing of each fiscal year. In conformance with other statutory provisions and Commission rules, the ACR includes the Postal Service's FY 2016 Comprehensive Statement, its FY 2016 annual report to the Secretary of the Treasury on the Competitive Products Fund, and certain related Competitive Products Fund material. See respectively, 39 U.S.C. 3652(g), 39 U.S.C. 2011(i), and 39 CFR 3060.20-23. In line with past practice, some of the material in the FY 2016 ACR appears in non-public annexes.
The filing begins a review process that results in an Annual Compliance Determination (ACD) issued by the Commission to determine whether Postal Service products offered during FY 2016 were in compliance with applicable title 39 requirements.
II. Overview of the Postal Service's FY 2016 ACR
Contents of the filing. The Postal Service's FY 2016 ACR consists of a 94-page narrative; extensive additional material appended as separate folders and identified in Attachment One; and an application for non-public treatment of certain materials, along with supporting rationale, filed as Attachment Two. The filing also includes the Comprehensive Statement, Report to the Secretary of the Treasury, and information on the Competitive Products Fund filed in response to Commission rules. This material has been filed electronically with the Commission, and some also has been filed in hard copy form.
Scope of the filing. The material appended to the narrative consists of: (1) Domestic product costing material filed on an annual basis summarized in the Cost and Revenue Analysis (CRA); (2) comparable international costing material summarized in the International Cost and Revenue Analysis (ICRA); (3) worksharing-related cost studies; and (4) billing determinant Start Printed Page 1765information for both domestic and international mail. FY 2016 ACR at 2. Inclusion of these four data sets is consistent with the Postal Service's past ACR practices. As with past ACRs, the Postal Service has split certain materials into public and non-public versions. Id. at 2-3.
“Roadmap” document. A roadmap to the FY 2016 ACR can be found in Library Reference USPS-FY16-9. This document provides brief descriptions of the materials submitted, as well as the flow of inputs and outputs among them; a discussion of differences in methodology relative to Commission methodologies in last year's ACD; and a list of special studies and a discussion of obsolescence, as required by Commission rule 3050.12. Id. at 3.
Methodology. The Postal Service states that it has adhered to the methodologies historically used by the Commission subject to changes identified and discussed in Library Reference USPS-FY16-9 and in prefaces accompanying the appended folders. Id. at 4. The Postal Service notes that one noteworthy methodological change regarding product costs was discussed by the Commission in Order No. 3506. Going forward, the Postal Service's calculation of attributable costs will be changing to include a product's inframarginal costs developed as part of the estimation of a product's incremental costs. FY 2016 ACR at 4. However, the Postal Service states that several complications associated with the change have precluded it from including the new inframarginal cost component into the CRA this year. Id. at 5-7. However, it has included additional information, including estimates on product specific incremental costs, to Library Reference USPS-FY16-NP10. It has also created a new library reference, USPS-FY16-43, to present the incremental costs for market dominant products. Id. at 7-8.
Market dominant product-by-product costs, revenues, and volumes. Comprehensive cost, revenue, and volume data for all market dominant products of general applicability are shown directly in the FY 2016 CRA or ICRA. Id. at 11.
The FY 2016 ACR includes a discussion by class of each market dominant product, including costs, revenues, and volumes, workshare discounts, and passthroughs responsive to 39 U.S.C. 3652(b), and FY 2016 incentive programs. Id. at 12-66.
In response to the Commission's FY 2010 ACD directives, the Postal Service states that it is providing information regarding: (a) All operational changes designed to reduce flats costs and the estimated financial effects of such changes (id. at 27-34); (b) all costing methodology improvements made in FY 2016  and the estimated financial effects of such changes (id. at 27-31); and (c) a statement summarizing the historical and current year subsidy of the flats product (id. at 36-38). In addition, the Postal Service states that in the next general market dominant price change, it plans to increase the price of Standard Mail Flats by at least CPI times 1.05. Id. at 37. In the FY 2015 ACD, the Commission directed the Postal Service to submit a report addressing several topics related to Periodicals pricing. The Postal Service states that it provided a response to that directive on July 26, 2016. FY 2016 ACR at 53. Additionally, the Postal Service provides an updated version of the Periodicals pricing report in Library Reference USPS-FY16-44. Id.
Flats directive. The Postal Service notes that the Commission directed the Postal Service to submit a detailed report addressing the measurement of cost and service performance issues for flat-shaped products in the FY 2015 ACD. The Postal Service states that its initial report addressing flats issues was filed on July 26, 2016, and additional responses were provided by the Postal Service in response to a Commission Information Request. FY 2016 ACR at 54.
Market dominant negotiated service agreements. The FY 2016 ACR presents information on the PHI Acquisitions, Inc. negotiated service agreement, the only market dominant negotiated service agreement in effect in FY 2016. Id. at 64-66.
Service performance. The Postal Service notes that the Commission issued rules on periodic reporting of service performance measurement and customer satisfaction in FY 2010. Responsive information appears in Library Reference USPS-FY16-29. Id. at 67.
Customer satisfaction. The FY 2016 ACR discusses the Postal Service's approach for measuring customer experience and satisfaction; describes the methodology; presents a table with survey results; compares the results from FY 2015 to FY 2016; and provides information regarding customer access to postal services. Id. at 70-81.
Competitive products. The FY 2016 ACR provides costs, revenues, and volumes for competitive products of general applicability in the FY 2016 CRA or ICRA. For competitive products not of general applicability, data are provided in non-public Library References USPS-FY16-NP2 and USPS-FY16-NP27. Id. at 82. The FY 2016 ACR also addresses the competitive product pricing standards of 39 U.S.C. 3633. Id. at 82-90.
Market tests; nonpostal services. The Postal Service discusses the four competitive market tests conducted during FY 2016, and nonpostal services. Id. at 91-92.
III. Procedural Steps
Statutory requirements. Section 3653 of title 39 requires the Commission to provide interested persons with an opportunity to comment on the ACR and to appoint an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) to represent the interests of the general public. The Commission hereby solicits public comment on the Postal Service's FY 2016 ACR and on whether any rates or fees in effect during FY 2016 (for products individually or collectively) were not in compliance with applicable provisions of chapter 36 of title 39 (or regulations promulgated thereunder). Commenters addressing market dominant products are referred in particular to the applicable requirements (39 U.S.C. 3622(d) and (e) and 39 U.S.C. 3626); objectives (39 U.S.C. 3622(b)); and factors (39 U.S.C. 3622(c)). Commenters addressing competitive products are referred to 39 U.S.C. 3633.
The Commission also invites public comment on the cost coverage matters the Postal Service addresses in its filing; service performance results; levels of customer satisfaction achieved; and such other matters that may be relevant to the Commission's review.
Access to filing. The Commission has posted the publicly available portions of the FY 2016 ACR on its Web site at http://www.prc.gov. Start Printed Page 1766
Comment deadlines. Comments by interested persons are due on or before February 2, 2017. Reply comments are due on or before February 13, 2017. The Commission, upon completion of its review of the FY 2016 ACR, comments, and other data and information submitted in this proceeding, will issue its ACD.
Public Representative. James Waclawski is designated to serve as the Public Representative to represent the interests of the general public in this proceeding. Neither the Public Representative nor any additional persons assigned to assist him shall participate in or advise as to any Commission decision in this proceeding other than in their designated capacity.
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
It is ordered:
1. The Commission establishes Docket No. ACR2016 to consider matters raised by the United States Postal Service's FY 2016 Annual Compliance Report.
2. Pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 505, the Commission appoints James Waclawski as an officer of the Commission (Public Representative) in this proceeding to represent the interests of the general public.
3. Comments on the United States Postal Service's FY 2016 Annual Compliance Report to the Commission are due on or before February 2, 2017.
4. Reply comments are due on or before February 13, 2017.
5. The Secretary shall arrange for publication of this order in the Federal Register.Start Signature
By the Commission.
Stacy L. Ruble,
1. United States Postal Service FY 2016 Annual Compliance Report, December 29, 2016 (FY 2016 ACR). Public portions of the Postal Service's filing are available on the Commission's Web site at http://www.prc.gov.Back to Citation
2. In years prior to 2013, the Commission reviewed the Postal Service's reports prepared pursuant to 39 U.S.C. 2803 and 39 U.S.C. 2804 (filed as the Comprehensive Statement by the Postal Service) in its ACD. However, as it did last year, the Commission intends to issue a separate notice soliciting comments on the comprehensive statement and provide its related analysis in a separate report from the ACD.Back to Citation
3. Id.; see Docket No. RM2016-2, Order Concerning United Parcel Service, Inc.'s Proposed Changes to Postal Service Costing Methodologies (UPS Proposals One, Two, and Three), September 9, 2016 (Order No. 3506).Back to Citation
4. The Postal Service states that it “would be inefficient and unduly disruptive . . . to immediately adjust prices to correct passthroughs that exceed 100 percent.” Id. at 11. It further states its intent to address such passthroughs in its next general price adjustment. Id.Back to Citation
5. The Postal Service notes that, in FY 2016, no rulemaking dockets resulted in costing methodology changes affecting Standard Mail Flats costs. Id. at 34. However, the Postal Service discusses several related developments required to foster a better understanding of the observed trend in reported costs for Standard Mail Flats. Id. at 34-36.Back to Citation
6. See Docket No. ACR2015, Annual Compliance Determination, March 28, 2016, at 23-24 (FY 2015 ACD).Back to Citation
7. Id.; see Docket No. ACR2015, FY 2015 ACD at 180-181.Back to Citation
[FR Doc. 2016-32053 Filed 1-5-17; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7710-FW-P