Skip to Content

Proposed Rule

Medicare and Medicaid Programs; Revisions to Certain Patient's Rights Conditions for Participation and Conditions for Coverage; Withdrawal

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble Start Printed Page 46181

AGENCY:

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), HHS.

ACTION:

Withdrawal of proposed rule.

SUMMARY:

This document withdraws a proposed rule that was published in the Federal Register on December 12, 2014. This proposed rule would revise the applicable conditions of participation for certain providers, conditions for coverage for certain suppliers, and requirements for long-term care facilities, to ensure that the requirements are consistent with the Supreme Court decision in United States v. Windsor (570 U.S.12, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013)), and HHS policy. Specifically, it proposed to revise certain definitions and patient's rights provisions that currently defer to state law, in order to ensure that same-sex spouses are recognized and afforded equal rights in certain Medicare and Medicaid-participating facilities.

DATES:

As of October 4, 2017, the proposed rule published December 12, 2014, at 79 FR 73873, is withdrawn.

Start Further Info

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Ronisha Blackstone, 410-786-6882.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

On December 12, 2014, we published a proposed rule in the Federal Register entitled, “Medicare and Medicaid Program; Revisions to Certain Patient's Rights Conditions of Participation and Conditions for Coverage” (79 FR 73873). In United States v. Windsor, 570 U.S.12, 133 S. Ct. 2675 (2013), the Supreme Court held that section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) was unconstitutional because it violated the Fifth Amendment (See Windsor, 133 S. Ct. 2675, 2695). Section 3 of DOMA provided that in determining the meaning of any Act of the Congress, or of any ruling, regulation, or interpretation of the various administrative bureaus and agencies of the United States, the word “marriage” meant only a legal union between one man and one woman as husband and wife, and the word “spouse” could refer only to a person of the opposite sex who was a husband or a wife (1 U.S.C. 7). Following the Supreme Court's opinion in Windsor, the Federal government was permitted to recognize the validity of same-sex marriages when administering Federal statutes and programs.

The December 2014 rulemaking proposed to revise certain conditions of participation (CoPs), conditions for coverage (CfCs), and requirements for certain Medicare- and Medicaid-participating facilities to ensure that the requirements at issue were consistent with the Windsor decision. We received 97 public comments in response to the December 2014 proposed rule. Following publication of the proposed rule, on June 26, 2015 in Obergefell v. Hodges, (135 S. Ct. 2584 (2015)), the Supreme Court held that the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment requires a state to license a marriage between two people of the same sex, and to recognize same-sex marriages lawfully performed in other States. In light of the Obergefell decision, we have decided to withdraw the December 2014 proposed rule. We believe that the Obergefell decision has addressed many of the concerns raised in the December 2014 proposed rule.

Accordingly, the proposed rule published December 12, 2014, at 79 FR 73873, is withdrawn.

Start Signature

Dated: August 24, 2017.

Seema Verma,

Administrator, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services.

Approved: September 7, 2017.

Thomas E. Price,

Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services.

End Signature End Supplemental Information

[FR Doc. 2017-21419 Filed 10-3-17; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 4120-01-P