This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This Guidance is rescinded effective October 5, 2017.
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
361
as of
09/14/2026 at 12:15 am EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2017-22012 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
10/11/2017 at 8:45 am.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2017-22012 (82 FR 47602)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), Treasury.
ACTION:
Rescission of guidance.
SUMMARY:
The OCC is rescinding its supervisory guidance entitled “Guidance on Supervisory Concerns and Expectations Regarding Deposit Advance Products” and OCC Bulletin 2013-40 (collectively, Guidance), which address the OCC's expectations regarding the offering of deposit advance products by national banks and federal savings associations (collectively, banks). The OCC is rescinding the Guidance in light of the adoption of a final rule on payday, vehicle title, and certain high-cost installment loans by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which overlaps with the Guidance, resulting in potentially inconsistent regulatory guidance for banks.
DATES:
This Guidance is rescinded effective October 5, 2017.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Paul Reymann, Director, Consumer Compliance Policy, (202) 649-5470; Steven Jones, Director, Retail Credit Risk, (202) 649-6220; Kenneth Lennon, Director, Community and Consumer Law, (202) 649-6350; Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, 400 7th Street SW., Washington, DC 20219 or, for persons who are deaf or hard of hearing, TTY, (202) 649-5597.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
In 2013, the OCC issued the Guidance to set forth the agency's expectations regarding deposit advance products offered by banks.[1]
A deposit advance product is a small-dollar, short-term loan or line of credit that a bank makes available to a customer whose deposit account reflects recurring direct deposits. The customer obtains a loan, which is to be repaid from the proceeds of the next direct deposit. The Guidance highlighted potential credit, reputation, operational, compliance, and other issues associated with deposit advance products and encouraged banks to be aware of these issues so that banks offering these products in response to their customers' short-term, small-dollar credit needs did not engage in practices that would increase these risks or result in the unfair treatment of bank customers.
Since adoption of the Guidance in 2013, the regulatory and marketplace landscapes have changed, and the OCC has gained supervisory experience with application of the Guidance to deposit advance products. Most recently, the CFPB adopted a rule entitled “Payday, Vehicle Title, and Certain High-Cost Installment Loans” (CFPB's Final Rule),[2]
regarding short-term, small-dollar loans, which overlaps with the Guidance and will therefore apply to many of the loans addressed by the Guidance. For example, the CFPB's Final Rule includes underwriting requirements for covered loans that are inconsistent with certain aspects of the Guidance. In addition, the CFPB's Final Rule provides for cooling-off periods that differ from those set forth in the Guidance. Thus, the continuation of the Guidance would subject banks to potentially inconsistent regulatory direction and undue burden as banks prepare to implement the requirements of the CFPB's Final Rule.
In addition, based on the changed regulatory and marketplace landscape and our supervisory experience noted above, the OCC is concerned that banks are able to serve consumers' needs for short-term, small-dollar credit. As a practical matter, consumers who would prefer to rely on banks and thrifts for these products may be forced to rely on less regulated lenders and be exposed to the risk of consumer harm and expense.
Accordingly, the OCC is rescinding the Guidance. In rescinding the Guidance, the OCC considered that many other OCC guidance documents cover key elements of consumer lending, and these guidance documents
( printed page 47603)
remain in effect and will continue to apply to deposit advance products.[3]
The OCC continues to support and encourage banks and savings associations to develop and use innovative products to meet customers' short-term, small-dollar credit needs and will continue to ensure that banks that choose to offer this type of product do so responsibly. In providing deposit advance products and other short-term, small-dollar loans, banks should be guided by basic principles of prudent underwriting and risk management as well as fair and inclusive treatment of customers. In particular, banks should consider the following core principles when offering innovative, short-term, small-dollar loan products:
All bank products should be consistent with safe and sound banking, treat customers fairly, and comply with applicable laws and regulations.
Banks should effectively manage the risks associated with the products they offer, including credit, operational, compliance, and reputation.
All credit products should be underwritten based on reasonable policies and practices, including guidelines governing the amounts borrowed, frequency of borrowing, and repayment requirements.
OCC examiners will continue to assess how banks offer short-term, small-dollar loan products, including whether management oversight is appropriate, whether risks posed by third-party relationships are appropriately managed, and whether the product complies with applicable federal consumer protection statutes. The OCC will take appropriate action to address any unsafe or unsound banking practice or violations of law associated with these products.
3.
See, e.g.,
Advisory Letter 2000-7, “Abusive Lending Practices”;
Comptroller's Handbook,
“Deposit-Related Credit” (underwriting, credit administration, management oversight); OCC Bulletin 2010-16, “Guidance for Evaluating Capital Planning and Adequacy” (capital planning); OCC Bulletin 2001-37, “ALLL Methodologies and Documentation” (ALLL); OCC Bulletin 2013-29, “Third-Party Relationships: Risk Management Guidance,” as supplemented by OCC Bulletin 2017-21, “Third-Party Relationships: Frequently Asked Questions to Supplement OCC Bulletin 2013-29.” The “Deposit-Related Credit” booklet, which provides guidance to and procedures for examiners, will be revised to remove references to the Guidance.