This PDF is the current document as it appeared on Public Inspection on 03/19/2019 at 8:45 am.
This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status. For complete information about, and access to, our official publications and services, go to About the Federal Register on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for legal research should verify their results against an official edition of the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Federal Communications Commission.
In this document, the Commission, via the Consumer and Governmental Affairs Bureau (CGB or Bureau), amends its rules by eliminating the rule that requires an opt-out notice on fax advertisements sent with the recipient's prior express permission or consent. This rule was declared unlawful by the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit and therefore its elimination is warranted to ensure uniform and consistent application of the rules.
Effective March 20, 2019.Start Further Info
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Rebecca A. Hirselj, Consumer Policy Division, CGB, at (202) 418-7603, email: Rebecca.Hirselj@fcc.gov.End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information
This is a summary of the Commission's Order (Order), in CG Docket Nos. 02-278, 05-338; DA 18-1159, adopted on November 14, 2018 and released on November 14, 2018. The full text of the Order is available for public inspection and copying via ECFS, and during regular business hours at the FCC Reference Information Center, Portals II, 445 12th Street SW, Room CY-A257, Washington, DC 20554. The full text of the Orde r and any subsequently filed documents in this matter may also be found by searching ECFS at: http://apps.fcc.gov/ecfs/ (insert CG Docket Nos. 02-278 and/or 05-338 into the Proceeding block). To request materials in accessible formats for people with disabilities (Braille, large print, electronic files, audio format), send an email to firstname.lastname@example.org or call CGB at (202) 418-0530 (voice), (202) 418-0432 (TTY) or (844) 432-2275 (videophone).
Final Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 Analysis
The Order does not contain any new or modified information collection requirements subject to the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, Public Law 104-13. In addition, therefore, it does not contain any new or modified information collection burden for small business concerns with fewer than 25 employees, pursuant to the Small Business Paperwork Relief Act of 2002, Public Law 107-198, see 44 U.S.C. 3506(c)(4).
Congressional Review Act
The Commission sent a copy of Order to Congress and the Government Accountability Office pursuant to the Congressional Review Act, see 5 U.S.C. 801(a)(1)(A).
1. In the Order, the Bureau eliminates the Commission's 2006 Solicited Fax Rule requiring opt-out notices on faxes sent with the recipients' prior permission or consent. This action is taken in response to the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit finding that the rule is unlawful to the extent that it requires opt out notices on solicited faxes. The Bureau also dismissed as moot ten pending petitions for retroactive waiver of the rule and two petitions for reconsideration of orders enforcing the rule.
2. In 1991, Congress enacted the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA). In relevant part, the TCPA prohibits the use of any telephone facsimile (fax) machine, computer, or other device to send an unsolicited advertisement to a telephone fax machine. In 1992, the Commission adopted rules implementing the TCPA, including restrictions on the transmission of unsolicited fax ads.
3. In 2005, Congress enacted the Junk Fax Prevention Act, which amended the fax advertising provisions of the TCPA. Among other things, the law required the sender of an unsolicited fax ad to provide specified notice and contact information on the fax that allows recipients to opt out of any future fax transmission from the sender and specified the circumstances under which a request to opt out complies with the Act.
4. In 2006, the Commission adopted the Junk Fax Order, published at 71 FR 25967, May 3, 2006, amending the rules concerning fax transmissions as required by the Junk Fax Prevention Act. As part of the Junk Fax Order, the Commission adopted the 2006 Solicited Fax Rule requiring that fax advertisements sent to a recipient that has provided prior express invitation or permission to the sender must include an opt-out notice.
5. The Bureau eliminates the Commission's 2006 rule requiring opt-out notices on fax advertisements sent with the recipient's prior express permission or consent. Specifically, in light of the court's decision that the rule is unlawful, § 64.1200(a)(4)(iv) of the Commission's rules is eliminated from Title 47 of the Code of Federal Regulations. The Bureau finds good cause to eliminate the rule without notice and comment because the rule has been vacated by the court in an order that has become final and nonreviewable. As such, seeking notice and comment before implementing the court's non-discretionary mandate would serve no purpose and is thus contrary to the public interest.Start Printed Page 10267
6. The Bureau also dismisses as moot ten pending petitions for retroactive waiver as well as the two pending petitions for reconsideration. The Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit declared unlawful and vacated the 2006 Solicited Fax Rule and the Bureau accordingly eliminated the rule as described above. Therefore, the Bureau finds no need to consider the remaining pending petitions seeking temporary waiver of the rule or seeking reconsideration of the Commission's application of the rule.
7. Pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 227 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), (j), 227, and the authority delegated in §§ 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 0.141, 0.361, that the Order is adopted and that § 64.1200 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 64.1200 is amended.
8. Pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 227 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), (j), and 227, and § 1.3 off the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.3, and the authority delegated in §§ 0.141 and 0.361 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 0.141, 0.361, that the petitions for retroactive waiver of § 64.1200(a)(4)(iv) of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 64.1200(a)(4)iv), filed by Safemark Systems, LP, Cynosure, Inc., United Auto Credit Corporation, Brigadoon Fitness Inc. and Brigadoon Financial Inc., Renue Systems Development Corp., Inc., et al., Chester Limited, Inc., Foot Levelers, Inc., M3 USA Corporation, Lane Labs-USA, Inc, and Getaway Seminars, Inc. are dismissed as moot.
9. Pursuant to sections 4(i), 4(j), and 227 of the Communications Act of 1934, as amended, 47 U.S.C. 154(i), (j), and 227, and § 1.3 of the Commission's rules, 47 CFR 1.3, and the authority delegated in § § 0.141 and 0.361 of the rules, 47 CFR 0.141, 0.361, that the petitions for reconsideration filed by Fetch, Inc., d/b/a Petplan and Ohio National Mutual, Inc., are dismissed as moot.
10. CGB's Reference Information Center, shall send a copy of the Order, including the Regulatory Flexibility Analysis, to the Chief Counsel for Advocacy of the Small Business Administration.Start List of Subjects
List of Subjects in 47 CFR Part 64
Federal Communications Commission.
Acting Legal Advisor, Consumer & Governmental Affairs Bureau.
For the reasons discussed in the preamble, the Federal Communications Commission amends 47 CFR part 64 as follows:Start Part
PART 64—MISCELLANEOUS RULES RELATING TO COMMON CARRIERSEnd Part Start Amendment Part
1. The authority citation for part 64 continues to read as follows:End Amendment Part
2. In § 64.1200:End Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
a. Remove paragraphs (a)(4)(iv); andEnd Amendment Part Start Amendment Part
b. Redesignate paragraphs (a)(4)(v), (vi), and (vii) as paragraphs (a)(4)(iv), (v), and (vi), respectively.End Amendment Part End Supplemental Information
[FR Doc. 2019-05276 Filed 3-19-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6712-01-P