Skip to Content

Notice

Raw Flexible Magnets From the People's Republic of China and Taiwan: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders

Document Details

Information about this document as published in the Federal Register.

Document Statistics
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are cumulative counts for this document including its time on Public Inspection. Counts are subject to sampling, reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Published Document

This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.

Start Preamble

AGENCY:

Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.

SUMMARY:

As a result of these second sunset reviews, the Department of Commerce (Commerce) finds that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on raw flexible magnets from the People's Republic of China (China) and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the level indicated in the “Final Results of Sunset Reviews” section of this notice.

DATES:

Applicable June 6, 2019.

Start Further Info

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:

Joshua Poole or Minoo Hatten, AD/CVD Operations, Office I, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1293 or (202) 482-1690, respectively.

End Further Info End Preamble Start Supplemental Information

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

On September 17, 2008, Commerce published in the Federal Register the AD orders on raw flexible magnets from China and Taiwan.[1] On February 5, 2019, Commerce initiated the second sunset reviews of the Orders, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act).[2]

On February 8, 2019, Commerce received notice of intent to participate from Magnum Magnetics Corporation (Magnum), within the deadline specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(1)(i).[3] Magnum, a domestic producer of the subject merchandise, claimed interested party status under section 771(9)(C) of the Act.[4]

On March 7, 2019, Commerce received adequate substantive responses from Magnum within the 30-day period specified in 19 CFR 351.218(d)(3)(i).[5] We received no substantive responses from any respondent interested parties. On March 20, 2019, Commerce notified the U.S. International Trade Commission (ITC) that it did not receive an adequate substantive response from respondent interested parties.[6] As a result, pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2), Commerce conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews of the Orders.

Start Printed Page 26401

Scope of the Orders

The products covered by this order are certain flexible magnets regardless of shape,[7] color, or packaging.[8] Subject flexible magnets are bonded magnets composed (not necessarily exclusively) of (i) any one or combination of various flexible binders (such as polymers or co-polymers, or rubber) and (ii) a magnetic element, which may consist of a ferrite permanent magnet material (commonly, strontium or barium ferrite, or a combination of the two), a metal alloy (such as NdFeB or Alnico), any combination of the foregoing with each other or any other material, or any other material capable of being permanently magnetized. Subject flexible magnets may be in either magnetized or unmagnetized (including demagnetized) condition, and may or may not be fully or partially laminated or fully or partially bonded with paper, plastic, or other material, of any composition and/or color. Subject flexible magnets may be uncoated or may be coated with an adhesive or any other coating or combination of coatings.

Specifically excluded from the scope of this order are printed flexible magnets, defined as flexible magnets (including individual magnets) that are laminated or bonded with paper, plastic, or other material if such paper, plastic, or other material bears printed text and/or images, including but not limited to business cards, calendars, poetry, sports event schedules, business promotions, decorative motifs, and the like. This exclusion does not apply to such printed flexible magnets if the printing concerned consists of only the following: A trade mark or trade name; country of origin; border, stripes, or lines; any printing that is removed in the course of cutting and/or printing magnets for retail sale or other disposition from the flexible magnet; manufacturing or use instructions (e.g., “print this side up,” “this side up,” “laminate here”); printing on adhesive backing (that is, material to be removed in order to expose adhesive for use such as application of laminate) or on any other covering that is removed from the flexible magnet prior or subsequent to final printing and before use; non-permanent printing (that is, printing in a medium that facilitates easy removal, permitting the flexible magnet to be re-printed); printing on the back (magnetic) side; or any combination of the above.

All products meeting the physical description of subject merchandise that are not specifically excluded are within the scope of this order. The products subject to the order are currently classifiable principally under subheadings 8505.19.10 and 8505.19.20 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). The HTSUS subheadings are provided only for convenience and customs purposes; the written description of the scope of the order is dispositive. A full description of the scope of the order is contained in the Issues and Decision Memorandum.[9]

Analysis of Comments Received

All issues raised in this sunset review, specifically the likelihood of continuation or recurrence of dumping and the magnitude of the margins likely to prevail if the Orders were to be revoked, are addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov and in the Central Records Unit, Room B8024 of the main Department of Commerce building. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed at http://enforcement.trade.gov/​frn/​.

Final Results of Reviews

Pursuant to sections 751(c)(1) and 752(c)(1) and (3) of the Act, Commerce determines that revocation of the AD orders on raw flexible magnets from China and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping, and that the magnitude of the margin of dumping likely to prevail if the AD Orders are revoked would be up to the following percentages: [10]

CountryWeighted- average margin (percent)
China185.28
Taiwan38.03

Notification Regarding Administrative Protective Order

This notice serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the disposition of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305. Timely written notification of the destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction.

We are issuing and publishing the results and notice in accordance with sections 751(c), 752(b), and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218.

Start Signature

Dated: May 31, 2019.

Jeffrey I. Kessler,

Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.

End Signature End Supplemental Information

Footnotes

1.  See Antidumping Duty Order; Raw Flexible Magnets from the People's Republic of China, 73 FR 53847 (September 17, 2008); Antidumping Duty Order: Raw Flexible Magnets from Taiwan, 73 FR 53848 (September 17, 2008) (collectively, Orders).

Back to Citation

2.  See Initiation of Five-Year (“Sunset”) Review, 84 FR 1705 (February 5, 2019).

Back to Citation

3.  See Letter from Magnum, “Five-Year Review of Raw Flexible Magnets from China and Taiwan: Notice of Intent to Participate,” dated February 8, 2019.

Back to Citation

4.  Id. at 2.

Back to Citation

5.  See Letter from Magnum, “Five-Year (“Sunset”) Review of the Antidumping Duty Orders on Raw Flexible Magnets from China and Taiwan: Domestic Industry Substantive Response,” dated March 7, 2019.

Back to Citation

6.  See Letter from Commerce to ITC, “Sunset Review Initiated on February 5, 2019 Applicable to January 2019,” dated March 20, 2019.

Back to Citation

7.  The term “shape” includes, but is not limited to profiles, which are flexible magnets with a non-rectangular cross-section.

Back to Citation

8.  Packaging includes retail or specialty packaging such as digital printer cartridges.

Back to Citation

9.  See Memorandum regarding “Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the Expedited Second Sunset Review of Raw Flexible Magnets from the People's Republic of China,” dated concurrently with and adopted by this notice (Issues and Decision Memorandum).

Back to Citation

[FR Doc. 2019-11864 Filed 6-5-19; 8:45 am]

BILLING CODE 3510-DS-P