This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
Notice of final results of sixth antidumping duty new shipper review and final results and partial rescission of the fourth antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the final results in the administrative review and new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Notice of preliminary results of sixth new shipper review and preliminary results and partial rescission of fourth antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of final results and partial rescission of the new shipper review and final results and partial rescission of the third antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of preliminary results and partial rescission of fourth new shipper review and preliminary results of third antidumping duty administrative review.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the final results in the new shipper review and administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Notice of extension of the time limit for the preliminary results in the new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain preserved mushrooms from the People's Republic of China.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
571
as of
09/04/2026 at 12:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2021-05188 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
03/11/2021 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
17
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2021-05188 (86 FR 14076)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY:
As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (Commerce) and the International Trade Commission (ITC) in their five year (sunset) reviews that revocation of the antidumping duty (AD) orders on certain preserved mushrooms (mushrooms) from Chile, India, Indonesia, and the People's Republic of China (China) would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping and material injury to an industry in the United States, Commerce is publishing a notice of continuation of the AD orders on mushrooms from Chile, India, Indonesia, and China.
DATES:
Applicable March 12, 2021.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Brian Smith or Katherine Johnson, AD/CVD Operations, Office VIII, Enforcement and Compliance, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 1401 Constitution Avenue NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-1766 or (202) 482-4929, respectively.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
On August 3 and 4, 2020, respectively, the ITC instituted [1]
and Commerce initiated [2]
five-year (sunset) reviews of the AD orders on mushrooms from Chile, India, Indonesia, and China, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). As a result of its reviews, Commerce determined that revocation of the AD orders on mushrooms from Chile, India, Indonesia, and China would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping. Therefore, Commerce notified the ITC of the magnitude of the margins of dumping likely to prevail were the orders to be revoked.[3]
On March 5, 2021, the ITC published its determination, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 752(a) of the Act, that revocation of the AD orders on mushrooms from Chile, India, Indonesia, and China would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time.[4]
Scope of the Orders
The merchandise subject to the orders is certain preserved mushrooms, whether imported whole, sliced, diced, or as stems and pieces. The preserved mushrooms covered under these orders are the species
Agaricus bisporus and Agaricus bitorquis.
“Preserved mushrooms” refer to mushrooms that have been prepared or preserved by cleaning, blanching, and sometimes slicing or cutting. These mushrooms are then packed and heated in containers including but not limited to cans or glass jars in a suitable liquid medium, including but not limited to water, brine, butter or butter sauce. Preserved mushrooms may be imported whole, sliced, diced, or as stems and pieces. Included within the scope of these orders are “brined” mushrooms, which are presalted and packed in a heavy salt solution to provisionally preserve them for further processing.
Excluded from the scope of these orders are the following: (1) All other species of mushroom, including straw mushrooms; (2) all fresh and chilled mushrooms, including “refrigerated” or “quick blanched mushrooms;” (3) dried mushrooms; (4) frozen mushrooms; and (5) “marinated,” “acidified” or “pickled” mushrooms, which are prepared or preserved by means of vinegar or acetic acid, but may contain oil or other additives.[5]
The merchandise subject to the orders is classifiable under subheadings: 2003.10.0127, 2003.10.0131, 2003.10.0137, 2003.10.0143, 2003.10.0147, 2003.10.0153, and 0711.51.0000 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheadings are provided for convenience and customs purposes, our written description of the scope of these orders is dispositive.
Continuation of the AD Orders
As a result of the determinations by Commerce and the ITC that revocation of the AD orders on mushrooms from Chile, India, Indonesia, and China would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of dumping, and material injury to an industry in the United States, pursuant to sections 751(c) and 751(d)(2) of the Act, Commerce hereby orders the continuation of the AD orders on mushrooms from Chile, India, Indonesia, and China. U.S. Customs and Border Protection will continue to collect AD cash deposits at the rates in effect at the time of entry for all imports of subject merchandise. The effective date of the continuation of the orders will be the date of publication in the
Federal Register
of this notice of continuation. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, Commerce intends to initiate the next five-year reviews of these orders not later than 30 days prior to the fifth anniversary of the effective date of continuation.
Administrative Protective Order
This notice also serves as the only reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return/destruction or conversion to judicial protective order of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3).
( printed page 14077)
Failure to comply is a violation of the APO which may be subject to sanctions.
These five-year (sunset) reviews and notice are in accordance with sections 751(c) and (d)(2), and 777(i) the Act, and 19 CFR 351.218(f)(4).
Dated: March 5, 2021.
Christian Marsh,
Acting Assistant Secretary for Enforcement and Compliance.
Footnotes
1.
See Certain Preserved Mushrooms from Chile, China, India, and Indonesia; Institution of Five-Year Reviews,85 FR 46725 (August 3, 2020).
3.
See Certain Preserved Mushrooms from Chile, India, Indonesia and the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Reviews of Antidumping Duty Orders,85 FR 78306 (December 4, 2020).
5.
On June 19, 2000, Commerce confirmed that “marinated,” “acidified,” or “pickled” mushrooms containing less than 0.5 percent acetic acid are within the scope of the AD order on mushrooms from China.
See
“Recommendation Memorandum-Final Ruling of Request by Tak Fat,
et al.
for Exclusion of Certain Marinated, Acidified Mushrooms from the Scope of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Preserved Mushrooms from the People's Republic of China,” dated June 19, 2000. On February 9, 2005, this decision was upheld by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit.
See Tak Fat
v.
United States,
396 F.3d 1378 (Fed. Cir. 2005).