SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

Commerce published the Preliminary Results of this review on November 4, 2021.^[1] On December 21, 2021, Commerce issued a post-preliminary analysis relating to two programs.^[2] On February 25, 2022, Commerce extended the deadline for the final results of this administrative review until May 3, 2022.^[3] For a complete description of the events that occurred since the Preliminary Results, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.^[4]

Scope of the Order

The product covered by this order is hot-rolled steel. For a complete description of the scope of this order, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Analysis of Comments Received

We addressed all issues raised in interested parties' case briefs in the Issues and Decision Memorandum accompanying this notice. A list of the issues raised by parties, to which Commerce responded in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is provided as an appendix to this notice. The Issues and Decision Memorandum is a public document and is on file electronically via Enforcement and Compliance's Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Centralized Electronic Service System (ACCESS). ACCESS is available to registered users at http://access.trade.gov. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly at http://access.trade.gov/​public/​FRNoticesListLayout.aspx.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

After evaluating the comments received from interested parties and record information, we have made certain changes to our analysis, but have made no changes to the net subsidy rate calculated for Hyundai Steel. For a discussion of these comments, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Methodology

Commerce conducted this review in accordance with section 751(a)(1)(A) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). For each of the subsidy programs found countervailable, we find that there is a subsidy, i.e., a government-provided financial contribution that gives rise to a benefit to the recipient, and that the subsidy is specific.^[5] For a description of the methodology underlying Commerce's conclusions, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum.

Final Rate for Non-Selected Company Under Review

There is one company in this review that was not selected as a mandatory respondent, i.e., POSCO. Because the subsidy rate calculated for mandatory respondent Hyundai Steel was above de minimis and not based entirely on facts available, we are applying that rate to POSCO. This methodology for establishing the subsidy rate for the non-selected company is consistent with our practice and with section 705(c)(5)(A) of the Act.

Final Results of Administrative Review

We determine that, for the period January 1, 2019, through December 31, 2019, the following net countervailable subsidy rates exist:

Disclosure

Normally, Commerce discloses to interested parties the calculations performed in connection with final results within five days of any public announcement or, if there is no public announcement, within five days of the date of publication of the notice of final determination in the Federal Register , in accordance with 19 CFR 351.224(b). However, because there are no changes from the Preliminary Results and Post-Preliminary Analysis, there are no new calculations to disclose.

Assessment Rate

Pursuant to section 751(a)(2)(C), Commerce will determine, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, countervailing duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise in accordance with the final results of this review. Commerce intends to issue assessment instructions to CBP no earlier than 35 days after the date of publication of the final results of this review in the Federal Register . If a timely summons is filed at the U.S. Court of International Trade, the assessment instructions will direct CBP not to liquidate relevant entries until the time for parties to file a request for a statutory injunction has expired ( i.e., within 90 days of publication).

Cash Deposit Requirements

In accordance with section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act, Commerce intends to instruct CBP to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties in the amounts shown for the companies listed above. For all non-reviewed firms, we will instruct CBP to continue to collect cash deposits of estimated countervailing duties at the most recent company-specific or all-others rate applicable to the company, as appropriate. These cash deposits, when imposed, shall remain in effect until further notice. ( printed page 27571)

Administrative Protective Order

This notice also serves as a final reminder to parties subject to administrative protective order (APO) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305(a)(3). Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a sanctionable violation.

Notice to Interested Parties

These final results are issued and published in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.221(b)(5).

Appendix—List of Topics Discussed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

I. Summary

II. Background

III. Scope of the Order

IV. Period of Review

V. Subsidies Valuation Information

VI. Analysis of Programs

VII. Discussion of the Issues

Comment 1: Whether the Korean Emissions Trading System (K-ETS) Provides a Countervailable Benefit

Comment 2: How Commerce Should Value Korean Allowance Units (KAUs)

Comment 3: Provision of Port Usage Rights at the Port of Incheon

Comment 4: Provision of Electricity from the Government of the Republic of Korea (GOK)

Comment 5: Whether the Restriction of Special Taxation Act (RSTA) and Restriction of Special Location Taxation Act (RSLTA) Benefits Should be Combined for Determining Measurability

Comment 6: Whether the Reduction for Sewerage Usage Fees in the City of Pohang is Countervailable

VIII. Recommendation