This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
The announcement of the guidance is published in the Federal Register on June 2, 2023.
Table of Contents
Enhanced Content - Table of Contents
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Draft Guidance for Industry on Arsenic in Apple Juice: Action Level; Supporting Document for Action Level for Arsenic in Apple Juice; A Quantitative Assessment of Inorganic Arsenic in Apple Juice; Availability
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
838
as of
09/11/2026 at 12:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2023-11769 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
06/01/2023 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
185
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2023-11769 (88 FR 36319)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
Food and Drug Administration, HHS.
ACTION:
Notice of availability.
SUMMARY:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA or we) is announcing the availability of a final guidance for industry entitled “Action Level for Inorganic Arsenic in Apple Juice.” The guidance identifies for industry an action level for inorganic arsenic in apple juice that is intended to help protect public health by reducing exposure to inorganic arsenic and is achievable with the use of current good manufacturing practices. It also describes our intended sampling and enforcement approach. Thus, the guidance finalizes the approach presented in the draft guidance issued in 2013.
DATES:
The announcement of the guidance is published in the
Federal Register
on June 2, 2023.
ADDRESSES:
You may submit either electronic or written comments on FDA guidances at any time as follows:
Electronic Submissions
Submit electronic comments in the following way:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov.
Follow the instructions for submitting comments. Comments submitted electronically, including attachments, to
https://www.regulations.gov
will be posted to the docket unchanged. Because your comment will be made public, you are solely responsible for ensuring that your comment does not include any confidential information that you or a third party may not wish to be posted, such as medical information, your or anyone else's Social Security number, or confidential business information, such as a manufacturing process. Please note that if you include your name, contact information, or other information that identifies you in the body of your comments, that information will be posted on
https://www.regulations.gov.
If you want to submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made available to the public, submit the comment as a written/paper submission and in the manner detailed (see “Written/Paper Submissions” and “Instructions”).
For written/paper comments submitted to the Dockets Management Staff, FDA will post your comment, as well as any attachments, except for information submitted, marked and identified, as confidential, if submitted as detailed in “Instructions.”
Instructions:
All submissions received must include the Docket No. FDA-2012-D-0322 for “Action Level for Inorganic Arsenic in Apple Juice: Guidance for Industry.” Received comments will be placed in the docket and, except for those submitted as “Confidential Submissions,” publicly viewable at
https://www.regulations.gov
or at the Dockets Management Staff between 9 a.m. and 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, 240-402-7500.
Confidential Submissions—To submit a comment with confidential information that you do not wish to be made publicly available, submit your comments only as a written/paper submission. You should submit two copies total. One copy will include the information you claim to be confidential with a heading or cover note that states “THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION.” We will review this copy, including the claimed confidential information, in our consideration of comments. The second copy, which will have the claimed confidential information redacted/blacked out, will be available for public viewing and posted onhttps://www.regulations.gov.
Submit both copies to the Dockets Management Staff. If you do not wish your name and contact information to be made publicly available, you can provide this information on the cover sheet and not in the body of your comments and you must identify this information as “confidential.” Any information marked as “confidential” will not be disclosed except in accordance with 21 CFR 10.20 and other applicable disclosure law. For more information about FDA's posting of comments to public dockets, see 80 FR 56469, September 18, 2015, or access the information at:
https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2015-09-18/pdf/2015-23389.pdf.
Docket:
For access to the docket to read background documents or the electronic and written/paper comments received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov
and insert the docket number, found in brackets in the heading of this document, into the “Search” box and follow the prompts and/or go to the Dockets Management Staff, 5630 Fishers Lane, Rm. 1061, Rockville, MD 20852, 240-402-7500.
You may submit comments on any guidance at any time (see 21 CFR 10.115(g)(5)).
Submit written requests for single copies of the guidance to the Division of Plant Products and Beverages, Office of Food Safety, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-317), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740. Send two self-addressed adhesive labels to assist that office in processing your request. See the
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION
section for electronic access to the guidance.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Eileen Abt, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition (HFS-317), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-1529; or Denise See, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition, Office of Regulations and Policy (HFS-024), Food and Drug Administration, 5001 Campus Dr., College Park, MD 20740, 240-402-2378.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
We are announcing the availability of a guidance for industry entitled “Action Level for Inorganic Arsenic in Apple Juice.” We are issuing this guidance consistent with our good guidance practices regulation (21 CFR 10.115). The guidance represents the current thinking of FDA on this topic. It does not establish any rights for any person and is not binding on FDA or the public. You can use an alternative approach if it satisfies the requirements of the applicable statutes and regulations.
In the
Federal Register
of July 15, 2013 (78 FR 42086), we announced the availability of a draft guidance for industry entitled “Arsenic in Apple Juice: Action Level.” We also announced the availability of two related scientific documents: a document entitled “Supporting Document for Action Level for Arsenic in Apple Juice” (supporting document),
( printed page 36320)
and a risk assessment entitled “A Quantitative Assessment of Inorganic Arsenic in Apple Juice” (the risk assessment document). We gave interested parties an opportunity to submit comments by September 13, 2013.
This guidance finalizes FDA's action level for inorganic arsenic in apple juice of 10 micrograms per kilogram (µg/kg) or 10 parts per billion (ppb) and identifies FDA's intended sampling and enforcement approach. The basis for the action level is set forth in the guidance document, as well as the risk assessment document originally made available on July 15, 2013, that can be accessed in the docket referenced above at
https://www.regulations.gov.
The guidance reviews data on inorganic arsenic levels in apple juice, health effects from exposure to inorganic arsenic, and the ability of manufacturers to achieve different levels of inorganic arsenic in apple juice. It also explains FDA's rationale for identifying an action level of 10 µg/kg or 10 ppb for inorganic arsenic in apple juice.
Arsenic is present in the environment as a naturally occurring substance or as a result of contamination from human activity. In foods, arsenic may be present as inorganic arsenic (the primary toxic form of arsenic) or organic arsenic. Exposure to inorganic arsenic is associated with adverse human health effects, including cancer and neurodevelopmental effects. Apple juice is one source of exposure to arsenic from food, and a greater potential source of exposure for children than adults, because children's dietary patterns are often less varied than those of adults, and they consume more apple juice relative to their body weight than do adults. We expect that the 10 µg/kg or 10 ppb action level, though non-binding, will help protect public health by encouraging manufacturers to reduce levels of inorganic arsenic in apple juice and therefore reduce human exposure to inorganic arsenic. We also expect that this level is achievable by industry with the use of current good manufacturing practices. We intend to consider the action level of 10 µg/kg or 10 ppb inorganic arsenic as an important source of information for determining whether apple juice is adulterated within the meaning of section 402(a)(1) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 342(a)(1)).
In finalizing the guidance, we incorporated data from the supporting document and added an analysis of new data on inorganic arsenic levels in apple juice, health effects from exposure to inorganic arsenic, and the ability of manufacturers to limit inorganic arsenic in apple juice, in evaluating the appropriate action level. We also made changes to the text for clarity, including explaining the term “added” in this context and that “apple juice” includes apple cider, and we have also revised the title of the guidance to more clearly show that we are setting an action level. In addition, we added information on our understanding of arsenical pesticide use in the United States and expanded the discussion of the rationale for setting an action level based on sampling and testing results and the discussion of FDA's sampling and enforcement approach. We also incorporated new references in support of these changes and to reflect the citation of recently published FDA data and a new reference to FDA's
Closer to Zero
action plan.
We also considered all comments received during the comment period in finalizing the document. Comments on the draft guidance requested that we consider establishing action levels for other foods containing arsenic, such as other apple products, other fruit juices, and rice; that the action level be lower than 10 ppb; that we consider additional risk management approaches; and that questioned the achievability of the action level of 10 ppb in apple juice. We did not receive new data from the comments supporting establishment of either a higher or lower action level. None of the comments caused us to change the approach set out in the draft guidance. We have clarified in the title of the final guidance that the action level of 10 ppb applies to inorganic arsenic.
Other comments suggested modifications to the risk assessment document. We note that the risk assessment report underwent peer review before we made it available to the public. (This can be found at
https://www.fda.gov/science-research/peer-review-scientific-information-and-assessments/completed-peer-reviews.) None of these comments supported a determination that the risk assessment document needs to be modified. We will continue to monitor research developments on adverse health effects of inorganic arsenic exposure to determine if new data support changes to the guidance.
II. Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
This final guidance contains no collection of information. Therefore, clearance by the Office of Management and Budget under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 is not required.