This site displays a prototype of a “Web 2.0” version of the daily
Federal Register. It is not an official legal edition of the Federal
Register, and does not replace the official print version or the official
electronic version on GPO’s govinfo.gov.
The documents posted on this site are XML renditions of published Federal
Register documents. Each document posted on the site includes a link to the
corresponding official PDF file on govinfo.gov. This prototype edition of the
daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov will remain an unofficial
informational resource until the Administrative Committee of the Federal
Register (ACFR) issues a regulation granting it official legal status.
For complete information about, and access to, our official publications
and services, go to
About the Federal Register
on NARA's archives.gov.
The OFR/GPO partnership is committed to presenting accurate and reliable
regulatory information on FederalRegister.gov with the objective of
establishing the XML-based Federal Register as an ACFR-sanctioned
publication in the future. While every effort has been made to ensure that
the material on FederalRegister.gov is accurately displayed, consistent with
the official SGML-based PDF version on govinfo.gov, those relying on it for
legal research should verify their results against an official edition of
the Federal Register. Until the ACFR grants it official status, the XML
rendition of the daily Federal Register on FederalRegister.gov does not
provide legal notice to the public or judicial notice to the courts.
Notice
Enter a search term or FR citation e.g.
88 FR 38230 FR 78782024-13208USDA09/05/24RULE0503-AA39SORN
Choosing an item from
full text search results
will bring you to those results. Pressing enter in the search box
will also bring you to search results.
Choosing an item from
suggestions
will bring you directly to the content.
Thank you for taking the time to create a comment. Your input is important.
Once you have filled in the required fields below you can preview and/or submit your comment to the Transportation Department for review. All comments are considered public and will be posted online once the Transportation Department has reviewed them.
This table of contents is a navigational tool, processed from the
headings within the legal text of Federal Register documents.
This repetition of headings to form internal navigation links
has no substantive legal effect.
FederalRegister.gov retrieves relevant information about this document
from Regulations.gov to provide users with additional context. This
information is not part of the official Federal Register document.
Document page views are updated periodically throughout the day and are
cumulative counts for this document. Counts are subject to sampling,
reprocessing and revision (up or down) throughout the day.
Page views
66
as of
10/14/2026 at 4:15 pm EDT
Other Formats
Enhanced Content - Other Formats
This document is also available in the following formats:
This PDF is FR Doc. 2024-08279 as it appeared on Public Inspection on
04/17/2024 at 8:45 am.
It was viewed
2
times while on Public Inspection.
If you are using public inspection listings for legal research, you
should verify the contents of the documents against a final, official
edition of the Federal Register. Only official editions of the
Federal Register provide legal notice of publication to the public and judicial notice
to the courts under 44 U.S.C. 1503 & 1507.
Learn more here.
Published Document: 2024-08279 (89 FR 27833)
This document has been published in the Federal Register. Use the PDF linked in the document sidebar for the official electronic format.
AGENCY:
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), Department of Transportation (DOT).
ACTION:
Receipt of petition.
SUMMARY:
Continental Tire the Americas, LLC (“CTA”), has determined that certain Continental VanContact A/S tires do not fully comply with Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standard (FMVSS) No. 139,
New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles.
CTA filed an original noncompliance report dated September 10, 2021, and subsequently petitioned NHTSA on September 30, 2021, for a decision that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety. This notice announces receipt of CTA's petition.
DATES:
Send comments on or before May 20, 2024.
ADDRESSES:
Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments on this petition. Comments must refer to the docket and notice number cited in the title of this notice and submitted by any of the following methods:
Mail:
Send comments by mail addressed to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590.
Hand Delivery:
Deliver comments by hand to the U.S. Department of Transportation, Docket Operations, M-30, West Building Ground Floor, Room W12-140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20590. The Docket Section is open on weekdays from 10 a.m. to 5 p.m. except for Federal holidays.
Electronically:
Submit comments electronically by logging onto the Federal Docket Management System (FDMS) website at
https://www.regulations.gov/.
Follow the online instructions for submitting comments.
Comments may also be faxed to (202) 493-2251.
Comments must be written in the English language and be no greater than 15 pages in length, although there is no limit to the length of necessary attachments to the comments. If comments are submitted in hard copy form, please ensure that two copies are provided. If you wish to receive confirmation that comments you have submitted by mail were received, please enclose a stamped, self-addressed postcard with the comments. Note that all comments received will be posted without change to
https://www.regulations.gov,
including any personal information provided.
All comments and supporting materials received before the close of business on the closing date indicated above will be filed in the docket and will be considered. All comments and supporting materials received after the closing date will also be filed and will be considered to the fullest extent possible.
When the petition is granted or denied, notice of the decision will also be published in the
Federal Register
pursuant to the authority indicated at the end of this notice.
All comments, background documentation, and supporting materials submitted to the docket may be viewed by anyone at the address and times given above. The documents may also be viewed on the internet at
https://www.regulations.gov
by following the online instructions for accessing the docket. The docket ID number for this petition is shown in the heading of this notice.
DOT's complete Privacy Act Statement is available for review in a
Federal Register
notice published on April 11, 2000 (65 FR 19477-78).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Jayton Lindley, General Engineer, NHTSA, Office of Vehicle Safety Compliance, (325) 655-0547.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Overview
CTA has determined that certain Continental VanContact A/S tires do not fully comply with the requirements of paragraph S5.5(b) of FMVSS No. 139,
New Pneumatic Radial Tires for Light Vehicles
(49 CFR 571.139). CTA filed a noncompliance report dated September 10, 2021, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573,
Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports.
CTA subsequently petitioned NHTSA on September 30, 2021, for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556,
Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.
This notice of receipt of CTA's petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any Agency decision or other exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.
II. Tires Involved
Approximately 419 Continental VanContact A/S tires, size LT 245/70R17 119/116 Q, manufactured between May 31, 2020, and May 22, 2021, are potentially involved.
III. Noncompliance
CTA explains that the noncompliance is that the tire size designation on both sidewalls of the subject tires, is missing the tire size prefix “LT” and, therefore, does not fully comply with paragraph S5.5(b) of FMVSS No. 139. Specifically, the tire size on the subject tires' sidewalls read “245/70R17 119/116 Q,” however, they should read “LT 245/70R17 119/116 Q.”
IV. Rule Requirements
Paragraph S5.5(b) of FMVSS No. 139 includes the requirements relevant to this petition. Each tire must be marked on each sidewall with the tire size designation as listed in the documents and publications specified in S4.1.1 of the standard.
V. Summary of CTA's Petition
The following views and arguments presented in this section, “V. Summary of CTA's Petition,” are the views and arguments provided by CTA. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency. CTA describes the subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.
In support of its petition, CTA submits the following reasoning:
CTA says that other than the missing tire size designation marking on both sidewalls, the subject tires contain all other required markings and meet the performance requirements of FMVSS No. 139.
( printed page 27834)
CTA states its belief that the missing markings do not impact the operational safety of the tires. CTA adds that the subject tire sidewalls contain the correct markings for the Load Index and load capacities for single and dual fitments and that “there is no higher load tire specified for size 245/70R17 in the [Tire and Rim Association] yearbook or the European Tyre and Rim Technical Organization, thus the tires could not mistakenly be placed in an overloaded application.”
CTA contends that the granting of a petition submitted by Michelin North America Incorporated describes a similar noncompliance to the one affecting the subject tires and therefore, supports the granting of its petition.
See
Michelin North America, Incorporated, Grant of Petition for Decision of Inconsequential Noncompliance, 78 FR 30963 (May 23, 2013).
CTA also says that the subject tires were installed on “pre-serial production vehicles” that were not sold to end consumers or released into the replacement tire market. Additionally, CTA says that all remaining CTA inventory will be destroyed and that “no additional tires will be manufactured or sold with the noncompliance.”
CTA concludes that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety and that its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.
In response to email correspondence from NHTSA on November 7, 2022, CTA clarified that Rivian owned, controlled, and operated the subject vehicles and the tires were sent to Toyota Arizona Proving Grounds for Prototype vehicle testing.
NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on this petition only applies to the subject tires that CTA no longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, any decision on this petition does not relieve equipment distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of the noncompliant tires under their control after CTA notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.
Comments on this document are being accepted at Regulations.gov. Submit a public comment