SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. Overview: VBC determined that certain MY 2009-2023 VBC 9700 buses do not fully comply with paragraph S7.7.15.3 of FMVSS No. 108, Lamps, Reflective Deivces, and Associated Equipment (49 CFR 571.108).

VBC filed a noncompliance report dated November 15, 2022, pursuant to 49 CFR part 573, Defect and Noncompliance Responsibility and Reports. VBC petitioned NHTSA on December 13, 2022, for an exemption from the notification and remedy requirements of 49 U.S.C. Chapter 301 on the basis that this noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety, pursuant to 49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h) and 49 CFR part 556, Exemption for Inconsequential Defect or Noncompliance.

This notice of receipt of VBC's petition is published under 49 U.S.C. 30118 and 30120 and does not represent any agency decision or another exercise of judgment concerning the merits of the petition.

II. Vehicles Involved: Approximately 958 MY 2009-2023 Volvo 9700 buses, manufactured between February 1, 2008 and May 1, 2022, were reported by the manufacturer.

III. Rule Requirements: Paragraph S7.7.15.3 of FMVSS No. 108 includes the requirements relevant to this petition. Paragraph S7.7.15.3 of FMVSS No. 108 requires that light rays reach all portions of an imaginary plate of the same size at least 25 mm ahead of the actual plate measured perpendicular to the plane of the plate.

IV. Noncompliance: VBC explains that the noncompliance is that the subject vehicles are equipped with license plate lamps that do not reach all portions of the license plate when the license plate is placed 25 mm ahead of its normal position. Therefore, the subject vehicles do not comply with paragraph S7.7.15.3 of FMVSS No. 108.

V. Summary of VBC's Petition: The following views and arguments presented in this section, “V. Summary of VBC's Petition,” are the views and arguments provided by VBC. They have not been evaluated by the Agency and do not reflect the views of the Agency. VBC describes the subject noncompliance and contends that the noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety.

VBC says that although the subject license plate lamps are noncompliant, when the license plate is installed in its normal position, it is fully illuminated by the lamps.^[1]

VBC states that it has corrected the subject noncompliance in vehicle production and production is currently in compliance with paragraph S7.7.15.3 of FMVSS No. 108. VBC notes that paragraph S7.7.15.3 of FMVSS No. 108 “refers to an imaginary plate in a testing position, and not a real license plate that requires physical testing with measurable test data.”

VBC contends that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential to motor vehicle safety because the noncompliant license plate lamps equipped on the subject vehicles fulfill its main purpose to ensure that law enforcement personnel and the public are able to identify vehicles in low-lighting conditions.

VBC explains that “except for vehicle testing purposes, the license plate is never installed in a position that differs from its original intended one.” Furthermore, VBC says no vehicles were delivered with a license plate in the testing position. Additionally, the license plates are fixed in the original position and cannot be adjusted. Thus, VBC believes that the license plate equipped on the subject vehicles “will always be fully illuminated under normal vehicle operating conditions.”

VBC says that “test results demonstrate that this noncompliance is imperceptible to road users considering that the license plate is fully illuminated when normally installed, as demonstrated in Attachment 2 `VBC Engineering Report ER-684684'.”

VBC says that since 2008, over 900 subject vehicles have been functioning with the noncompliance at issue, and VBC has not received any customer complaints, field reports, or warranty claims related to the subject noncompliance. VBC adds that it is not aware of any accidents, injuries, or death related to the subject noncompliance.

VBC says that NHTSA has granted prior petitions in which a noncompliance involving the license plate lamps “is expected to be imperceptible, or nearly so, to vehicle occupants or approaching drivers.” VBC believes that the subject noncompliance is imperceptible to all road users, therefore, VBC contends that NHTSA should also grant VBC's petition.

VBC concludes by stating its belief that the subject noncompliance is inconsequential as it relates to motor vehicle safety and its petition to be exempted from providing notification of the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30118, and a remedy for the noncompliance, as required by 49 U.S.C. 30120, should be granted.

NHTSA notes that the statutory provisions (49 U.S.C. 30118(d) and 30120(h)) that permit manufacturers to file petitions for a determination of inconsequentiality allow NHTSA to exempt manufacturers only from the duties found in sections 30118 and 30120, respectively, to notify owners, purchasers, and dealers of a defect or noncompliance and to remedy the defect or noncompliance. Therefore, any decision on this petition only applies to the subject vehicles that VBC no longer controlled at the time it determined that the noncompliance existed. However, any decision on this petition does not relieve vehicle distributors and dealers of the prohibitions on the sale, offer for sale, or introduction or delivery for introduction into interstate commerce of the noncompliant vehicles under their control after VBC notified them that the subject noncompliance existed.

( printed page 38945)

(Authority: 49 U.S.C. 30118, 30120: delegations of authority at 49 CFR 1.95 and 501.8)